• Comment (12)

What Could Go Right (and Wrong) for the Economy in 2012

If things go right, 2012 could signal the beginning of the end of a four-year economic slump

December 8, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Recent improvements in the U.S. economy don't change the fact that 2011 was the latest in a series of tough economic years, dating all the way back to 2007. This year, Standard & Poor's downgraded U.S. debt for the first time ever. Unemployment is still nearly 9 percent, despite the economy adding jobs last month. Home prices throughout the country continue to fall or refuse to rise.

But the year's end has brought some encouraging news to light. The U.S. economy is growing slowly. Consumer confidence, which gauges the public's feelings about the economy and has been down for years, stabilized. According to Fannie Mae's Economics & Mortgage Market Group, Americans are now in a "wait and see" mode, hoping for the best in 2012.

[See 12 Ways to Stop America's Decline.]

Whether or not this hope is misplaced depends on a number of factors. If things go right, 2012 could signal the beginning of the end of a four-year economic slump. But if things go wrong, the modest recovery the United States is experiencing will be a brief respite from continued financial agony.

The following factors will determine the fate of 2012:

European financial crisis. Europe's financial problems are far from over. Greece, Italy, Portugal, and other European Union nations remain in danger of default. There is still a chance that the eurozone could break apart.

[See What Happens If Italy's Economy Collapses?]

European leaders are meeting this week in Brussels to work out an agreement on government spending and fiscal discipline. According to Christine Thompson, chief investment officer of Fidelity Investments bond group, the outcome of this meeting will go a long way toward determining whether the euro zone can weather the storm. If it does survive, Thompson says she expects its debt problems to have repercussions throughout the world.

"We'll continue to have two steps forward, one step back. People [are] looking at the severity of the teeth of any policy statement that comes out and viewing it very skeptically," Thompson said Tuesday at the Thomson Reuters' Lipper Investment Series 2012 Outlook panel discussion. "What that means is markets will be volatile."

If the crisis is resolved, that volatility is likely limited. However, if the crisis lingers, or Europe takes a turn for the worse, repercussions will be felt on this side of the Atlantic. "While we're not forecasting recession, we expect the combination of slightly tighter fiscal policy and potential financial shock from the crisis to result in weaker growth in the near term," wrote Andrew Tilton, senior economist at Goldman Sachs, in his 2012 investment outlook.

Political uncertainty at home. In 2011, politicians did more to hurt the economy than to help it. Congress's failure to compromise on a debt deal led to the S&P downgrade of U.S. debt. This failure led to a second one, by the congressional "super committee" charged with finding trillions in savings. At the same time, Republicans and Democrats were unable to agree on a job stimulus package. Now, they're unable to agree on a payroll tax extension. If no agreement is made, some Americans who earn more than $50,000 will be paying higher taxes next year. Right now, the only thing each side can agree on is that the impasse is the other's fault.

[See 3 Homegrown Threats to the U.S. Economic Recovery.]

"I know many Republicans have sworn an oath never to raise taxes as long as they live. How could it be that the only time there's a catch is when it comes to raising taxes on middle-class families?" asked President Barack Obama in a speech earlier this week. "How can you fight tooth-and-nail to protect high-end tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans, and yet barely lift a finger to prevent taxes going up for 160 million Americans who really need the help?"

Republicans answered this charge with an accusation that Democrats are the ones who refuse to compromise. After the super committee's failure, there is little hope for compromise on the tax issue.

Things aren't likely to improve in 2012, either. As the presidential election race moves forward, Obama and the GOP candidate will offer competing economic proposals and Congress will remain divided. Action on these plans won't take place until 2013.

[See How Americans Are Rethinking Prosperity.]

Reasons for optimism. Despite the threat posed by the European crisis,and the political gridlock in Washington, there is reason for hope. According to Goldman Sach's Tilton, U.S. consumers are saving more and spending less, lightening the country's debt burdens. Tilton also said that the U.S. Federal Reserve could rise above partisanship in Washington and act to stimulate the economy.

Alec Letchfield, chief investment officer of wealth management at HSBC Global Asset Management, said that stock investments made in 2012 would pay off down the line. So 2012 might be a good time for Americans to invest some of the money they saved during the downturn.

@davidcfrancis

Tags:
Barack Obama,
economy,
Obama administration,
Fannie Mae,
2012 presidential election,
money

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Reserve currencies and the banking systems that create them are the single greatest civil rights crimes on the planet.

Until governments reclaim their sovereign authority and power to issue national currencies there can be no equitable distribution of resources or economic justice. Privately owned banking cartels create money as bookkeeping entries lending it at interest to government who can never repay both the principal and the interest because nobody created the extra money for the interest payments. When national debts go unpaid, the banking system steps in, foreclosing on national assets and stripping the country at fire sale prices. The banks and bankers do not stave people, but they create the poverty that does.

Only when government issue national currencies in the interest of their citizens, will the people of the world prosper.

BILL PARKS of MD 10:13PM February 08, 2012

America is a vast playing field of economic opportunity. Those who win biggest on that field should pay the most rent, in the form of income taxes. The rich, who use more of the field and it's facilities (courts, government, advantgeous laws passed, tax dodges, etc.) should pay more taxes than the poor and middle class, who derive much less out of the services provided by government. (The poor and middle class can't afford to buy themselves a congressman). Of the 47% who do not pay taxes, it's true that some are lazy bums, but many are elderly and poor and many do not make enough money to be required to pay taxes. Sorry, but intil the rich are taxed for their fair share, the Unided States economy is not going to get much better and the deficit willl continue to climb.

OkieAmerican of KS 1:24PM December 22, 2011

We need a fair tax where everyone (and that includes the 47% of freeloaders who pay zero today) all pay their "fair share". I am tired of the talk about the rich paying their fair share. How about the lazy 47% who pay nothing today. Most contribute nothing to the society and must start paying income tax.

Kevin of TN 10:46AM December 22, 2011

Most Connected Company

Find out how America’s best companies are succeeding by tapping big data, mobile solutions, social media, and crowdsourcing to adapt and compete in an increasingly connected world.

See the companies »

advertisement

Slide Shows

Best-Sellers to Help Your 2013 Finances

Seeking advice? Check out these acclaimed financial books.

10 Warning Signs of Identity Theft

About 10 million Americans fall victim each year.

Items You Should Buy Online

Skip the store to save money and time.

Latest Video

advertisement