• Comment (7)

The Politics and Economics of Occupy Wall Street

Now that the movement appears to be losing steam, what political and economic impact did it have?

December 12, 2011 RSS Feed Print

The Occupy Wall Street movement shut down a shipping port in Portland Monday morning as part of a larger effort to cut corporate profits.

"By shutting down work at the ports this [is] one more day that Goldman Sachs and Wall Street firms are unable to create profit," said Occupy Portland spokeswoman Kari Koch, according to the Portland Tribune.

[See 12 Ways to Stop America's Decline.]

The Portland protest is part of what the movement calls its "Shut Down Wall Street on the Waterfront" effort, an attempt to disrupt trade at San Diego, Portland, Los Angeles, Tacoma, Oakland, and Seattle. Previously, Occupy Wall Street protesters managed to shut down the port in Oakland, one of the biggest on the West Coast.

Meanwhile, back on the East Coast where the movement originated, protesters surrounded Goldman Sachs, demanding that the company pay more taxes. "We're standing in solidarity against an investment firm that was highly responsible for the economic crisis," demonstrator Rick McAllister, 22, told the New York Daily News. "My message is: 'For us to survive, you have to go.'"

These renewed protests come weeks after the Occupy Wall Street movement seemed to be drawing to a close. Police in cities throughout the country cleared protesters from parks that served as the center of the movement against the country's "1 percent"—a nebulous group that possess 1 percent of the nation's wealth, and includes corporations, politicians, and the news media. They believe this group is behind the income inequality in America, or the gap that has been growing between the middle and upper classes.

[See 7 Stressors Sapping the Middle Class.]

After parks were cleared, the news media had abandoned the story and the general public, which watched the movement grow with a mix of support and disdain, stopped paying attention.

But today's protests show that the Occupy Wall Street movement is far from dead. Calls to a phone number provided to the media by the group were not returned.

Occupy Wall Street's next step remains unclear. According to a message on its website, it is currently planning additional actions following today's port protest. "To the 1%'s pundits who claim Occupy is over: We are still here. Even as the agents of the 1% evict our communities and eviscerate our rights, we are evolving. What we have set in motion cannot be stopped with tear gas, bulldozers, rubber bullets, or metal barricades," the group proclaimed on its website.

But what exactly has this movement set in motion? What outcomes has it affected? As Occupy Wall Street begins a new phase of protesting, U.S. News explored just what effect the protests have had on American politics and the American economy.

Political. Compared with the Tea Party, the political impact of Occupy Wall Street has been minimal. Unlike the Tea Party, no national politicians have publicly aligned themselves with the movement and no members have been elected to national office.

However, prominent Republican pollster Frank Luntz recently told the Republican Governor's Association that he's "scared of this anti-Wall Street effort. I'm frightened to death." Luntz said he believed the movement is "having an impact on what the American people think of capitalism."

[See 17 Ways Consumers Are Changing.]

President Barack Obama reflected this impact in a speech last week in Kansas. He blasted Republicans as out of touch with everyday Americans and accused Wall Street of hurting the middle class though fraud and dishonest practices. "At stake is whether this will be a country where working people can earn enough to raise a family, build a modest savings, own a home, and secure their retirement," Obama said.

Tags:
Occupy Wall Street,
corporate taxes,
economics,
debt,
money,
federal taxes

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

الأخت نهى، أعود للتعليق على تعليقك و تحديداً نقطة عدم إلتزام الشركة بموضوع المحرم و رأيي في ذلك, و للأمر عدة أوجه منها بالتأكيد أنني لست بمتخصص في الشريعة و لا أعرف حقيقةً تفاصيل موضوع المحرم. يعني هل يجوز شرعاً أن تعيش إمراءة في بلد ليس لها محرم فيه.. و سؤال أخر هو هل يمكن إعتبار وجود نساء أخريات مسلمات في نفس البلد أو نفس الجامعة مخارم أم لا!. بالنسبة لرأيي الشخصي، فأعتقد أنه من حق الشركة أن لا تلتزم بدفع تكاليف المحرم بالنسبة لمن يريد أن يلتحق بالبرنامج و من يكون وجود المحرم لها مهم من الناحية الشرعية فعليها أن توفر ذلك لنفسها. في ذات الوقت أفكر في كيف يمكن لفتاة خريجة ثانوي أن توفر لها محرم إلا لو كانت متزوجة. فحتى لو كان لديها أخ مثلاً مستعد للذهاب معها فنحن نتكلم عن فترة لا تقل عن الأربع سنوات، ما الذي سيفعله أخوها الموجود معها في الخارج خلال هذه الفترة الطويلة!!. و بالتأكيد سيكون من الأصعب أن يصاحب الأب إبنته المبتعثه للخارج لأن لديه بقية العائلة و عمله!. بأمانة أرى أن هناك خلط من قبلك بين التمسك بالهوية الإسلامية و الوطنية و موضوع الإبتعاث و المحرم. لأنني أعتقد أن الفتاة التي ستلتزم بالهوية الوطنية و الإسلامية في الخارج في حال وجود محرم معها “فقط” هى شخص غير أمين و غير مؤمن في حقيقة الأمر بهذه الهوية التي أشرت إليها. في نفس الوقت أدرك تماماً أن الحياة في الخارج تختلف كلياً عن الحياة لدينا و هذا أمر يتعرض من خلاله الكثير من المبتعثين (و خصوصاً خريجي الثانوية) لتأثيرات قوية جداً تؤثر عليهم و على تفكيرهم و تصرفاتهم و من هنا أعتقد أن المسؤولية الأولى هى مناطة بوالد المبتعث فمن يعرف أن إبنه أو بنته لا يمكن لهم أن يواجهوا ضروف الحياة في الخارج فيجب أن يتحملوا المسؤولية و يوجهوا أبنائهم نحو إتجاه بديل و من يجد في أبنائه القدرة على مواجهة هذه الظروف فله أن يأخذ بأيديهم نحو هذا الطريق و عليه أن يتحمل المسؤولية و لا يلقى بأي مشاكل مستقبلية على الأخرين.

pakistani escorts in dubai of CA 9:17AM May 12, 2013

I will actually be interviewing expert author Natalie Pace in which I will be raising a number of questions based on this very article (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/jon-hansen/2012/02/02/wall-street-woes-impact-on-investors-series-2).

Jon Hansen 2:53PM January 25, 2012

We the people what should do is sacrificing more take out our monies and get into Credit Unions so Banks will go and keep only the 1% that do not pat fees like us,late fees,overdraft fees,ATM charges because we the people let the bank used our money to keep the 1% mounting interest and make their accounts bigger,Stop buying in big chains and just buy what we need such as food etc.If all protesters do this the movement will harm the riches pockets.

Margie of NY 12:41AM December 22, 2011

Most Connected Company

Find out how America’s best companies are succeeding by tapping big data, mobile solutions, social media, and crowdsourcing to adapt and compete in an increasingly connected world.

See the companies »

advertisement

Slide Shows

Best-Sellers to Help Your 2013 Finances

Seeking advice? Check out these acclaimed financial books.

10 Warning Signs of Identity Theft

About 10 million Americans fall victim each year.

Items You Should Buy Online

Skip the store to save money and time.

Latest Video

advertisement