The Baucus Healthcare Plan: What Small-Business Owners Need to Know

What business owners should look out for as healthcare reform moves ahead

September 25, 2009 RSS Feed Print

In the battle to pass some form of healthcare reform, small business is a major player. Earlier this year, Congress proposed reform bills that would put in place heavy fines on businesses that fail to provide healthcare for their employees, with the exception of those that have just a few employees. Small-business political associations in Washington quickly denounced these provisions as too burdensome for too many businesses.

[See Is Healthcare Still a Promising Field?]

Now, what's on the table for healthcare reform has changed. In early September, the Senate Finance Committee put forth a new healthcare bill that removes those penalties on businesses. Instead, it offers carrots to employers that provide healthcare, while keeping a few sticks. The bill, associated with its main sponsor, Democratic Sen. Max Baucus of Montana, seeks to expand insurance coverage through the creation of nonprofit insurance exchanges at the state level. These exchanges, under recent amendments Baucus accepted, will be open to small businesses with up to 100 employees.

Although the Senate is currently debating numerous amendments to the bill, many of the most relevant pieces that apply to small business don't seem to be points of contention. One thing is for sure: Many elements of the bill will have a profound impact on how employers seek out and pay for insurance for their employees.

[See 4 Conundrums That Impede Healthcare Reform.]

Here are, from the perspective of small-business owners, some of the most important pieces of the current plan to reform healthcare.

Tax credits. The new carrots in the bill are in the form of tax credits for employers that provide their employees health insurance. But not every employer can cash in on these incentives. Only businesses with 25 or fewer employees would qualify. However, about 92 percent of small businesses with employees fall into this category, according to the SBA. There's one further qualification: The average wage of all of the business's employees must be no greater than $40,000. Most business owners will want to pay attention to how much these credits could save them, and when.

In 2011 and 2012, the bill would allow employers to deduct from their taxes an amount equal to the dollar amount the employer contributes for each employee's coverage, multiplied by a certain percentage. This percentage would be based on the amount of the employee's total premium contributed by the employer, or the average premium in the employer's state. Starting in 2013, the state insurance exchanges kick in, and the credit applies only to businesses that purchase insurance through those exchanges.

So would these write-offs revolutionize the way small businesses provide employee healthcare? Bill Rys, tax counsel for the National Federation of Independent Businesses, says expectations shouldn't be too high. The size and length of the credit—just four years—aren't high enough for businesses that are strapped for cash to suddenly consider buying healthcare. But the credit could make a difference for business owners "on the cusp"—those unsure if they can afford employee coverage. "It does provide some immediate cost relief," he says. The relief is especially large for the smallest businesses. Businesses with fewer than 10 employees and less than $20,000 in average wages get to keep the tax credit in full. For larger businesses, it begins to phase out starting in 2013.

But there are also some potential problems. If a business owner starts paying employees more and the average wage surpasses the $40,000 mark, the business could no longer be eligible for the credit. That wage requirement could make employers reluctant to give out raises. Rys says that this is a real concern, but he's not too worried. There isn't much incentive for employers to keep average wages down for the same reason that the tax credits won't have small businesses rushing out to buy health insurance. The length of the credits is just too short. "The concern would be greater if the credit were longer, but the credit is for only two years before the exchange starts," Rys says.

Tags:
small business,
healthcare

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I have a very small business, me and sometimes one employee. I can barely scrape by. I would love to have a full time employee and offer health benefits but can't. I have to pay out over $14,000 per year for a family plan that is horrible. There is only really one plan available to us, and it sucks! Almost none of the local doctors even are part of the network. If I made less money I wouldn't be able to pay the rent but we could get Family Health Plus.

You must love this country. If you try to do the right thing you get screwed and taxed to death. Lie, cheap, hide income, steal, swindle investors and open a health insurance company and live the good live.

In the next 10 years I will pay over $250,000.00 for health, life, disability, auto, liability, unemployment, workmans comp insurance, etc. If the next 10 years are anything like the last 10 years it will be for almost nothing. Please explain to me how this is fair?

Luke of NY 6:10PM October 05, 2009

I am for A trigger on the tax to business’s encase they do not do the right thing,

Of course they will spend more getting out of doing the right thing than what they actually need to pay for health care.

And they should have to pay health care for part time workers as well. Lets not give them another way out like last time. If they cannot give a little back they can stay small So others can start a small business and do better. A city can only handle so many businesses, Why do you think every small town does not have a wall mart superstore or 6 or 7 large department stores because small towns cannot support that many.

Small is good big is greed. Lets run the big businesses out of business so more small shops can start up.

Don D. Brock

Don D. Brock of AZ 10:42PM October 04, 2009

I'm worried about this "excise tax" on "gold-plated cadillac" policies if premiums are the only criteria for deciding what's a cadillac policy. My latest health insurance quote for me alone is about $1200/month, for a total of $14400/year. This is not a "gold-plated cadillac" policy. I am a cancer survivor and I am very lucky to get any health insurance at all in the individual market. The problem with this excise tax on premiums is, it penalizes people like me through no fault of our own. (Despite what the President says, I am proof that cancer is not something you can prevent with a healthy lifestyle.) So under this legislation, is my effective premium going to be $14400 + (35% of (14400-8000) or $2240) + self employment tax (15.3% or $2546) = $19,186/year? This policy doesn't cover a lot of my yearly medical expenses, either, and I have to pay for those completely post-tax. The irony is, far more was paid to health insurance companies by me or for me than my cancer treatments ever cost.

Kristin of VA 11:02PM September 28, 2009

U.S. News Rankings & Research

U.S. News delivers quality analysis and clear objective rankings to help you make informed financial decisions.

advertisement

Slide Shows

Is Your Portfolio Ready for a Double-Dip?

With the looming threat of a double-dip recession, investors should position their portfolios to protect themselves from another downturn.

advertisement