The Future of Internet Taxation

Unstoppable fees very likely to spread across the Web

November 26, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

The Internet used to be a haven from taxes and fees. Legislators didn't want to stunt the growth of E-commerce, plus collecting taxes or other levies was technologically tricky way back in the 1990s. But better E-commerce technology and the boom in online sales have made the Internet a tempting target for the government taxman and companies trying to grab more user dollars. Then again, what's wrong with a little taxation? Shouldn't our governments receive a sliver of what we spend on the Web just as they do every time we buy at brick-and-mortar shops? But prominent libertarian David Friedman says that users hit by higher taxes will vote with their feet and switch states or even countries: "Unless [governments] are willing to put up a Berlin Wall, or the equivalent, if their tax rates are high or their regulations are oppressive, or something their citizens don't like—lo and behold, they'll find someplace else."

Here are three aspects of Internet taxation and fee collection, and how they might affect you in the near future:

Internet sales. Online shopping has grown to $136 billion per year. To get in on the cash flow, Web sales taxes have popped up in 22 states, with plenty more considering it. But that's scaring some online businesses and consumers. Thanks to higher gas prices, the Internet has become an important tool for savings on transport of goods. Ordering online and paying a minimal fee for postage is well worth the few days' wait for many. But higher taxes could change all that.

"I don't mind paying for services that are delivered. But I don't see any connection between Internet sales tax and any service that the government is providing," says Travis Corcoran, one of the more than 27 million small-business owners potentially affected by Internet sales tax. Starting in his Arlington, Mass., house, Corcoran created two online businesses from scratch. His DVD rental service, SmartFlix.com, and comic book store, HeavyInk.com, now bring in about $1.25 million per year. Even as his companies grow, Corcoran says Internet sales tax "might wipe out my ability to run these firms."

And an Internet sales tax could encourage exporting jobs to different states, just like the foreign offshoring found in the manufacturing sector. Gene Hoffman, chairman and CEO of the online payment management company Vindicia and cofounder of the online music store eMusic, says relocation is a real and increasing problem for states. "Things that make a state less appealing to telecommute from are going to make or break whether businesses and workers want to live there." He reminds that "Microsoft didn't start in Seattle," and the relocation process is easy now as many companies are Web-based, like Corcoran's.

Businessmen like Corcoran might be able to sway state decisions on sales taxes as they conduct more and more of their business online. Chris Clark, chief operating officer of the remote work technology supplier Fiberlink Communications, says computers will soon allow users to "taste an orange or smell the fermentation in a particular wine ... We'll even experience a handshake over an Internet appliance," making the states businesses are based in almost irrelevant.

Internet access. Beginning next year, France will tax Internet access to replace lost revenue from the new ban on commercials on prime-time television. President Nicholas Sarkozy backed the plan, which will tax phone and Internet providers by 0.9 percent of their turnover. Last year in the United States, there was a unanimous vote in both houses of Congress to extend an Internet access tax moratorium. But the ban was not made permanent, and will expire in 2014 if not renewed. Rep. Roy Blunt, a Missouri Republican, said last year that Democrats know that "new taxes on our digital economy right now is unpalatable, but that resurrecting the plan sometime in the future may hold greater promise." Problem is, says Vindicia's Hoffman, laws are harder to avoid than bad service. "If Comcast or my DSL provider [bills for access], I can spend $50 to switch ... To 'switch' away from California passing a dumb law that taxes Internet access at $10 a month costs me at least hundreds of thousands of dollars."

Aside from the burdens of an access tax, access itself will be changing. Allen Kupetz, author of Future of Less, says the three things you always have with you (keys, wallet, and phone) will converge into a multi-use device. "You'll have a wristwatch or bracelet or a pendant," which will allow connection to a cashless system. And that device will be able to recommend a place to eat lunch at noon based on where you are and your food preference.

Tags:
websites,
taxes,
internet,
technology,
e-mail

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Ultimately, Internet transactions will be taxed. Wherever there is the possibility of taxes, there will one day be taxes.

I purchase things I want on the Internet, not things I need. When they begin to tax Internet transactions I will no longer purchase. I don't know how many people are like me, but I would think there are a few. Certainly I don't purchase food or clothing, nor office supplies. I get these things locally. At Christmas I make purchases because I don't have to ship what I send.

So, if the purchases of the Internet are taxed then my purchases will cease. One thing that most of you are missing is that purchases over the Internet are already taxed through a states use tax. Most, if not all states, require that purchases made outside the state be declared once a year when preparing your taxes, even states like Tennessee, which does not have an income tax. They require that you pay the difference in tax from what you paid to what you would have paid in state. Therefore, if no taxes were charged on your purchase then you would owe the state the amount that would have been charged in state.

Already your ISP, cable company, or phone company charge you taxes for the use of the material used to get the service to you.

Taxes are just undercover right now, but soon they will be in BOLD print.

JW Morrison of TN 6:06PM December 16, 2008

Local retail stores provide jobs for people in their towns and pay taxes for the government services their businesses consume. Why should they have an automatic 9% disadvantage in competing against giant (or even small) companies from another state? Why should a buyer in any town be able to sidestep his obligation to support local government, whose services he consumes every day, while supporting businesses that give nothing back to his state or local community?

I'm no fan of sales taxes. They are regressive, corrupt, and inherently unjust. But why should brick and mortar businesses--the backbone of most communities--be burdened when online businesses are not?

Those online businesses ship their products to local customers over roads local businesses pay taxes to maintain. The safety of their shipments is protected by state and local law enforcement organizations that are funded by state and local taxes. The very viability of the localities into which goods purchased online are shipped is heavily supported by local sales taxes. There's no free lunch, but online retailers, and short sighted customers, don't want to believe that.

Bryan of WA 3:18PM December 05, 2008

Just as state and local governments provide exemptions from sales taxes for a variety of economic activities (sales tax holidays on back to school expenses is but one example), they should be prohibited from applying sales taxes to Internet sales.

Such an exemption would benefit consumers who shop online as well. A click of the mouse uses a lot less gas than a trip to the mall, and the mail carrier and FedEx/UPS trucks delivering the goods will be coming down your street anyway. Americans work more hours than any other society. Online shopping and also saves a lot of time, a precious commodity for all of us in our society where long working hours leaves too little time for personal relationships and other interests.

The public strongly supports exempting Internet sales from state and local sales taxes. In a 2008 issue of Parade Magazine readers were asked: “Should Internet Sales Be Taxed”?

Based on 3,125 survey responses, 85% opposed taxing Internet sales. Some of the comments of those opposed:

“An Internet tax would make online shopping less attractive, reduce sales and could force many online retailers out of jobs.”

“The Internet is one of the last ways that small businesses can compete with the big guys. Leave the Internet alone!”

“We’re taxed to death already. It’s a level playing field: Local businesses collect taxes, and online retailers charge shipping. It should be the consumer’s decision which one he wants to pay.”

Congress and state legislators should listen to their constituents, who overwhelmingly oppose the taxation of Internet sales.

American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance

bruce hahn of VA 9:26PM December 02, 2008

Most Connected Company

Find out how America’s best companies are succeeding by tapping big data, mobile solutions, social media, and crowdsourcing to adapt and compete in an increasingly connected world.

See the companies »

advertisement

Slide Shows

Best-Sellers to Help Your 2013 Finances

Seeking advice? Check out these acclaimed financial books.

10 Warning Signs of Identity Theft

About 10 million Americans fall victim each year.

Items You Should Buy Online

Skip the store to save money and time.

Latest Video

advertisement