What a 9.7 Percent Unemployment Rate Means

February 5, 2010 RSS Feed Print

Despite economists' expectations that the unemployment rate would climb well into the economic recovery, the percentage of unemployed, job-seeking Americans fell 0.3 percentage point in January to 9.7 percent, its lowest point since August. The unemployment rate is calculated through a separate survey from the payroll count, which found the nation's employers still reluctant to add new workers, as jobs fell by 20,000.

[See the 50 Best Careers for 2010.]

The report truly brought mixed news. While employers are still not beefing up their payrolls, the Labor Department's survey of households found major employment gains. The results were altogether better than many were expecting. "All in all, we see encouraging signs of progress in labor market conditions and expect to see much better payroll performance ... in coming months," Morgan Stanley economists Ted Wieseman and David Greenlaw wrote in a morning note.

Where is the hiring? For one thing, the Labor Department reports that the number of people in part-time jobs who want full-time work but can't find it or had their hours cut, fell from 9.2 million to 8.3 million. Not surprisingly, the average number of hours worked in a week rose 0.1 hour to 33.3 hours. These are good indications that demand is picking up and employers are responding by paying their employees to work more hours, which may be a first step, before they begin hiring new workers.

Perhaps the strongest indicator that employers are testing the hiring waters is the continuing increase in temporary help services jobs. In January, employers added 52,000 temp jobs, bringing the total number of temp jobs added since September to 247,000. Many economists consider temp services a leading indicator for permanent hires, but some are cautious. "Whether this is a harbinger of stronger gains in permanent employment or a reflection of many businesses still not being convinced that they need to pull the trigger on permanent hires remains to be seen," says Joshua Shapiro, chief U.S. economist at MFR.

The retail sector also saw job growth, adding 42,000 jobs last month. The biggest gains were in food stores and clothing stores. Healthcare continued to expand its payrolls, and the federal government added 33,000 jobs, 9,000 of which are temporary positions for the census. State and local governments, wrestling with major budget woes thanks to a double whammy of higher recessionary expenses and lower tax revenues, continued to lose jobs.

[See 9 Insider Secrets to Getting Hired.]

Who's seeing some benefit? This recession has been coined the "man-cession," because of the massive job losses in the construction and manufacturing industries, which traditionally employ disproportionately high percentages of men. Indeed, last month, women made up an astounding 49.9 percent employed workers. When the recession began in 2007, 48.8 percent of nonfarm payroll employment was made up of women. Last month the unemployment rate for women fell to 7.9 percent, compared with a steady 10 percent unemployment rate among men.

A major bright spot in the report was the significant decline in the percentage of under-employed workers—the job-seeking unemployed plus those who are working part-time but want full time work; the unemployed who are not looking for work because they are in school or have other obligations; as well as those who have simply lost hope in finding work. In January, the under-employed made up 16.5 percent of the workforce, down 0.8 percentage point from December.

Who's still hurting? There's no question that the workers struggling most now are those who have been out of work the longest. The number of unemployed who have been out of work for 27 weeks or more reached 6.3 million in January. The average duration of unemployment among the jobless reached 30.2 weeks. That means more than 40 percent of the unemployed have been looking for work for about seven months or more.

That may in part be because the recession continues to hammer specific sectors. Construction employment fell by another 75,000 in January. Most of the job losses were in non-residential specialty trade construction. The sector has now lost 1.9 million jobs since the start of the recession. Also last month, 19,000 transportation and warehousing jobs were cut, driven by a big loss in courier and messenger jobs.

Tags:
unemployment

Reader Comments Read all comments (34)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

there's a great new opportunity out here in Iowa.

$7.25 per hour to go back to work as a "trainee".

Open only to 55 yrs or older.

Of course, there are tax incentives for the employers in this program.

NOW we begin to see just what is going on.

20 hrs per week maximum.

We will be allowed to work the same job for min. wage, while fatso gets fatter on our sweat.

I am not playing.

If you are smart, you won't, either.

Make your own job, keep your own money.

Mark Van Auken of IA 11:58AM May 14, 2010

I am another one of the jobless unable to find work because of my age and health. I have a bad back and am considered a health risk and that doesn't include the fact that I am in my upper 50's. I have many years of experience and would stay at a job longer than a few months or a year.The companies that are hiring are not interested in my skills. They think I will retire soon and leave then or are afraid something will happen to my back and then I would sue them. Give me a break! I am not able to get help from Welfare because I am single and no children in my home. What a rip that is. I can pay for all the people scamming the system but not able to get ligitimate help when I need it.

I am looking at the fact I may be joining the rank of forclosure folks. This stinks because I have worked hard paying my mortage and the upkeep on the home. Now I am faced with loosing it all because I am not able to find a job.

BAIL OUT THE PEOPLE NOT THE GREEDY MONEY GRUBER BANKS that put us in this position in the first place. They are crooks who are scamming us all and our Government is helping them. Without the people paying their way they won't survive. With no job how am I going to pay the taxes that are being used to pay the Crooks? Land of the Free maybe but should be Land of the POOR and getting poorer. Sure glad I am going to be able to face my maker with a clean slate.

Jane Doe of KS 8:39AM May 03, 2010

What happens is that the goverment doesn't want to open their eyes to the reality.They created 162,000 jobs,but who will take those jobs,?are all those jobs only federal jobs? and all those jobs are full time or part time jobs?

Also include in those jobs are the temporary workers for the Census,so as soon that the census is over,they will back to the unemployment records,so what is the recovery that they are talking about? I'm 60 yrs old and I became unemployed in 2007 since then i coudn't get a job,because of my age and health history of cancer,so like me there are millions of persons looking for job and for sure we will never get one.So we are under EDD FED-ED extensions and the congress didn't make any move toward the next Tier V for unemployment.Can you imagine how many people will be without any money after 4/12/10 when the Tier 4 end.

tony of CA 8:33PM April 03, 2010

Jobs That May Interest You

advertisement

Slide Shows

The 10 Best Jobs

Check out the top tier of our list of The Best Jobs of 2012.

U.S. News Rankings & Research

U.S. News delivers quality analysis and clear objective rankings to help you make informed financial decisions.

Advance your career with an online degree

Latest Video

advertisement