In a sign that the labor market is inching toward a recovery, employers tacked a net total of 162,000 workers onto their payrolls in March, according to the Labor Department's monthly jobs report.
But even with this spike, the unemployment rate remains unchanged at 9.7 percent. And chances are it won't budge anytime soon. "We are recovering painfully slowly in the job market," says Josh Bivens, an economist at the Washington, D.C.-based Economic Policy Institute. "[The March numbers are] essentially job growth consistent with a stable unemployment rate. So it's good that they're not consistent with a rising one, but it's not the kind of job growth that we need to really start working off the jobs hole we're in."
[See the 50 Best Careers of 2010.]
Flooding the market. There are two monthly metrics that determine the rate of job growth. The main measure, which stems from a survey of employers, indicated that 162,000 jobs were created in March. But a second survey, which polls individual households, is the one that's used to calculate the unemployment rate. That poll showed even more robust job creation—somewhere in the neighborhood of 264,000 jobs—for the month of March.
At first blush, it seems somewhat paradoxical that the unemployment rate is holding steady even as jobs are being created. But economists see the stable jobless figure as an indication that Americans are pouring back into the labor market in hopes that the economy has healed enough for them to find work.
The government measures unemployment by dividing the number of jobless workers by the total size of the labor force. But only people who are employed or actively seeking jobs are considered to be part of the labor force.
[See What a 9.7 Percent Unemployment Rate Means.]
As the recession tore through the job market, around 3 million workers dropped out of the labor force instead of continuing to search for employment. Now, as the economy rebounds, they appear to be returning en masse. "This looks to me like the return of those 3 million workers who dropped out of the labor force, and this is why it's going to be very hard to drive the unemployment rate down," says Bivens.
During a normal month, according to Bivens, the economy needs to add around 115,000 jobs just for the unemployment rate to remain stable. But with the burgeoning labor force, that number will likely be even higher in the coming months. In other words, for every worker who finds a job, there are new members of the labor force who are still looking for employment.
Notably, the number of job seekers who have been unemployed for at least 27 weeks shot up by 414,000 in March and now stands at 6.5 million. This spike suggests that as more workers join the labor force, the unemployed could face longer waits before getting hired. "People reenter the labor force, but they don't get a job right away," says Joshua Shapiro, the chief U.S. economist at the consulting firm MFR.
Ultimately, then, payrolls will need to expand far more rapidly for the unemployment rate to trail off. In fact, Shapiro expects the rate to get a bit higher in the coming months as the economy absorbs the onslaught of new job seekers. "It's not necessarily a negative indicator," he says of the potential for a return to 10 percent unemployment. "It's just [a] reality."
The good news. In anticipation of March's jobs report, economists had predicted that the Labor Department would announce the creation of around 200,000 jobs. But even though the actual number came in below the target, there are still a number of encouraging trends.
For starters, private-sector job creation, despite a gloomy prediction earlier this week by ADP, was actually quite robust in March. Specifically, the Labor Department indicated that the private sector accounted for 123,000 of the 162,000 jobs that were created last month. Meanwhile, the public-sector job growth stemmed largely from temporary hires who are working for the Census Bureau.
Prior to the jobs report, it was unclear how many workers the government would bring on board to help with the census. According to Conrad DeQuadros, an economist at RDQ Economics, experts had overestimated the boost that the census would provide, and that's the real reason the Labor Department's numbers didn't quite meet the 200,000 target.