Why Job Searches Should Start—But Not End—On the Web

May 4, 2010 RSS Feed Print

Simmi Singh, a public-relations veteran, joined the mushrooming ranks of the unemployed in January 2009. Armed with nearly a decade of experience in her field, Singh was confident that finding a new job would be as simple as a few clicks of a mouse. She devoted nearly all of her time and energy to scouring online job boards, but after a year of trolling seemingly every crevice of the Web and applying for more than 400 PR and marketing jobs, she remained jobless. "I know we're in a downturn, but good people usually find a good job," Singh laments. "To find out that no one will even talk to you is really frustrating."

[See 10 Jobs With Great Return on Investment.]

Singh's year of disappointment gave way to celebration in February when she landed a PR position at Oregon-based EthicsPoint after applying via Craigslist. Although she eventually found a job, some in the industry caution against such a Web-heavy approach to a job search. "People have this mistaken impression that the job board they're using is magic," says Steven Rothberg, CEO of job board CollegeRecruiter.com. "They apply to 200 jobs and then sit back and wait for the phone to ring."

[See 9 Little-Known Ways to Damage Your Reputation at Work.]

Site sorting. Not all online job seekers endure an odyssey like Singh's, but career counselors agree that job sites should be a small part of anyone's employment hunt. Only 13.2 percent of external hires in 2009 were made via job boards, according to a corporate study done by staffing consultancy CareerXroads. Frank Tortorello Jr., executive director of career services at Franklin and Marshall College in Pennsylvania, notes that the industry's largest players, ­CareerBuilder and Monster, are good places to start a job search but not to consummate one. He suggests job seekers use listings on each site to identify the qualifications needed for a given position, but he says the sites offer little beyond that.

In an effort to improve the experience for users, CareerBuilder has created a job recommendation engine that analyzes its users' job-search habits and recommends jobs to them based on that analysis. The firm notes that 50 percent of all job applications submitted through its site originate from this process.

Career experts say that the big job boards are best for job seekers in professions that are typified by high turnaround—like sales—but that they are less effective for highly qualified applicants or those looking for work in smaller industries. But Jason Ferrara, CareerBuilder's vice president of corporate marketing, maintains that the company's site is well suited for nearly every field and position. "We have jobs of all different types of titles, all different types of levels," he says.

Industry insiders claim that job hunters would have much better luck if they invested time filling out detailed profiles on sites like Jobfox, which filter the best job matches to users based on their profiles. While a job hunter may be able to apply to 20 jobs in the time it takes to fill out a comprehensive profile, such a résumé blast is most likely a wasted effort. If people used matching technology more frequently, "the industry would be transformed overnight," notes Rothberg. "There would be much less dissatisfaction."

Job seekers may have more success at smaller boards that are broken down by job category or even geographic region. According to Peter Weddle, executive director of the International Association of Employment Web Sites, there are more than 50,000 job boards in the United States alone. "You name it, there's a job board for it," he says.

Michael Young, an out-of-work teacher in Utah who has been looking for a new position since December, says he has had more success generating leads on the niche site Teachers-Teachers.com than on the larger boards. Ultimately, career advisers feel there's no substitute for phone calls and handshakes. "[Job boards] can be effective, but it's not the only thing someone should have in their arsenal," says Art Taguding, executive director of career services at Stevenson University in Maryland. "Networking is key."

Tags:
internet,
careers,
employment

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Based on this article, I signed up for JobFox a couple weeks ago. They have sent me one job referral -- when I clicked on it, it said, "The company has removed this job posting." What they've also sent me is daily, unsolicited e-mails for a resume re-write at a "special low price" of $359 (almost double the cost of any other such service I've been offered, and I've been offered a bunch). Call JobFox what it is: a spammer. It sure isn't a job-hunting site.

mrgate3 of MI 10:01AM May 14, 2010

I firmly believe that aside from the fact that many employers don't have the time to interview perspective workers, the fact remains that they are too picky. There are a lot of people out there who want to work, but are overlooked for one reason or another. Many of these people are good workers, and would show up for work, whereas the people who do get hired, are often absentee, and offer the poorest excuses for their lack of attendance. I think we need to revert to the hiring practices that served us so well in the past.

janet of PA 9:08AM May 13, 2010

Some readers may incorrectly infer that I recommend that job seekers use JobFox. I do feel that the matching technology trumpeted by sites like JobFox hold promise, but only in those very, very rare circumstances when both the job seeker and the employer have spent the time necessary to complete the lengthy process required by the matching engines. If they don't, then all the technology in the world won't be able to help and actually may hurt their efforts because the two sides will essentially abdicate their responsibilities to technology without providing that technology with the necessary information for it to do its job.

The reality is that very, very few job seekers and even fewer employers are able or willing to spend the 30 to 60 minutes typically needed per posting and instead rush the process by spending at most a few minutes. They provide a small portion of the information necessary and then blame the poor results on JobFox or whatever matching engine they're using. It is kind of like failing to get an oil change for your car and then blaming the car manufacturer when your engine seizes up after 50,000 miles.

I recommend that job seekers spend one of their first job search days on the job boards. Use an aggregator or two (i.e., Indeed, SimplyHired, TopUSAJobs, or LinkUp); use a general job board (i.e., Monster or Careerbuilder); and use niche sites which are targeted to your industry (i.e., Dice), geographic location (i.e., Jobing), or experience level (i.e., CollegeRecruiter.com). Search the job postings and apply to all of those which are of interest to you and for which you're qualified. Set up resume match agents / alerts so you'll be notified when new jobs are posted which match your interests. Then go away and never come back until you receive one of those agents and it truly matches your interests. Spend the rest of your time networking. By the way, networking is where you look for ways to help other people, not the other way around.

Steven Rothberg CollegeRecruiter.com of MN 11:19AM May 12, 2010

Jobs That May Interest You

advertisement

Slide Shows

The 10 Best Jobs

Check out the top tier of our list of The Best Jobs of 2012.

U.S. News Rankings & Research

U.S. News delivers quality analysis and clear objective rankings to help you make informed financial decisions.

Advance your career with an online degree

Latest Video

advertisement