Why the May Jobs Report is Better—and Worse—Than it Looks

June 4, 2010 RSS Feed Print

Census hiring made last month's employment picture look pretty good, as total employment grew by 431,000. But tear off the 411,000 temporary jobs added to the federal government's payrolls for the decennial census, and the picture gets fuzzy. Private-sector employers added just a tenth of the jobs tied to the census. The Labor Department considers those 41,000 jobs to be "little" change—hardly what any economist, job seeker, or Washington lawmaker wants to see at this point in the fledgling recovery (and this close to November elections).

[See 9 little-known ways to ruin your work reputation.]

The unemployment rate slid back to 9.7 percent, after rising to 9.9 percent in April. April's higher figure actually seemed to reflect a kind of optimism among those who were out of work and had given up looking during the recession, as they reentered the labor force to try again and pushed up the unemployment rate. But last month, the number of unemployed re-entrants fell by 286,000. In general, the May jobs report is more closely aligned with other job data, particularly jobless claims, which have been depicting a less rosy job market than that drawn in previous monthly employment reports.

It was bad news for construction: The construction industry was hammered by the housing bust and economic freefall, but had finally begun to add jobs in recent months. Not last month. Construction employment dropped by 35,000 jobs—enough to largely offset the gains made over the previous two months. The job losses spanned the construction sector, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

[See 7 jobs in which women out-earn men.]

But good news for manufacturing: Manufacturing added 29,000 jobs in May. Factory jobs have jumped by 126,000 over the last five months. Joshua Shapiro, chief U.S. economist at MFR, calls the sector "red hot," noting that increasing hours in the average manufacturing workweek pushed the average workweek for all private workers up to 34.2 hours in May from 34.1 in April. "This outdistanced market expectations of no change," Shapiro says.

There were positive signs for the future: The average workweek rises because employers are giving their existing employees more hours to work to meet increasing demand. The number of temporary help services jobs jumped by 31,000 in May, bringing the total number of new temp jobs to 362,000 added since September. These signs point to stronger employment growth ahead, according to Morgan Stanley Research economists Ted Wieseman and David Greenlaw. "The payroll employment result was disappointing, but almost everything else in the report was stronger than anticipated," the economists wrote in a morning report. "The bottom line is that we continue to anticipate job gains of about 200,000 per month (ex-census) over the balance of the year."

Economists' expectations for wage growth were well surpassed last month. Average hourly earnings jumped by 7 cents, or 0.3 percent. Economists were expecting growth closer to 0.1 percent. Average hourly earnings have jumped 1.9 percent over the past 12 months. Another positive sign: The number of part-time workers who want full-time jobs or had their hours cut fell by 343,000 to 8.8 million in May.

[See why teen unemployment is related to more than the recession.]

Last month's sluggish private-sector growth was clearly the low point of the report. "The question is whether the dip in payroll gains is simply one of the minor but inevitable hiccups we will hit on the path toward recovery or is it indicative of larger issues that could result in a double-dip recession," says John Challenger of outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. "It may be too early to tell. The next several months should provide better clues as to the sustainability of the recovery."

What's happening in Washington: The issue of long-term joblessness continues to rankle lawmakers. Last month there were 6.8 million workers who have been out of work for six months or more—making up about 46 percent of the total unemployed. A jobs bill now in the Senate—passed by the House last week—would extend unemployment benefits yet again. Benefit extensions have been a lifeline to workers suffering extreme long-term unemployment while job creation remains sluggish (there are 5.6 unemployed workers for every opening). The National Employment Law Project estimates that 1.2 million jobless workers will lose their benefits in June, if they go without another extension.

Labor Secretary Hilda Solis said in a note this morning that the government would continue to push for programs for the unemployed: "I call on Congress to extend the unemployment insurance and COBRA subsidy provisions in the Recovery Act through the end of the year. The president has called on Congress to expand the clean energy manufacturing tax credit and to help small businesses with tax cuts and a lending fund to help them get the credit they need to create jobs."

Tags:
employment

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Let's look at some facts folks, take a deep breath and thin for a minute.

If there is "free reign" of corporations in the U.S. Then why are so many companies going bankrupt? The richest 10% of Americans pay over 80% of taxes in the U.S. The only sector of the US economy that is growing is the government itself as of June of 2010.

Reagan has been out of office since 1989. It is now 2010. Reagan has been out of power for 21 years so it is unfair to blame the current financial crises on former President Reagan who left office 21 years ago and is now deceased. Since 1989 we have had 10 years of Democratic presidents(Obama 2 yrs/Clinton 8) as well as 12 years of Republican presidents (Bush Sr. 4 yrs/ Bush Jr. 8 years) Both political parties are to blame.

The real root of the problem is the Federal Reserve system, a fiat money supply and US monetary policy in general. This is the immediate culprit for inflation, economic booms/busts, and high unemployment as a result of those policies.

The second reason in my opinion why the US is so messed up is "we the people" ourselves. Most Americans cannot do basic mathematical calculations. Most Americans cannot read or write properly as evidenced by so many online blogs that I read. Most americans play the political "blame game", which is hate Clinton, hate Bush, hate Obama, hate Reagan etc. Think about it. What does America produce today that is the best in the world? The only thing I can think of is that we are the fattest and largest consumers and spenders in the world.

Brian of NJ 10:16AM June 17, 2010

You should get it right and say the founders did not want a Central bank. ie(Federal Reserve) to control the money supply. Industry is a good thing unless you are a tree hugger who wants to apologize for the industrial revolution. With 40 million receiving a welfare sponsored check and over 37 million people working in a job which is paid for from the private sector coupled with the fact that the "funds" for SSI were raided years ago and are an unfunded liability with the biggest boomer generation retiring. That is nearly one third of the US population not including kids who dont contribute yet. You can understand why the debt to GDP is so close to 100%. All told, the numbers for our total public debt is around 113 trillion and not the 13 trillion reported by the news. That amounts to over 331 thousand dollars of debt for every taxpayer. Only six countries have the issue near those numbers and greater than ours and they are P.I.I.G.S. with G.B. at the top with a number near 430% of GDP.

So don't be stupid with the "rich aren't paying their fair share" comment. Our money is becoming worthless because of the banking elite who are printing us out of existence with notes of debt and a congress that wont abide by the constitution. Oh and lets not forget the idiot in chief who wants us to be more like an Oligarchy. Get your facts straight maxx before you shoot your mouth off. It makes you like like you will be nedding a plexi-glass belly button to give you a porthole to see out of with your head so far up your........

Jeff of WI 2:14PM June 07, 2010

Ah come on...keep blaming it on the rich and they aren't bearing the burden. It's getting old along with the Reagan lines. The "facts" are that the top 1% of wage earners are paying 40% of federal income taxes and the top 5% of wage earners are already paying over 80%. More than 40% of the working population doesn't even pay federal income tax anymore.

By the way, it's a fact that Reagan cut taxes and almost doubled the federal income to the treasury.

Let's keep those facts straight

s d of IL 12:39PM June 07, 2010

Jobs That May Interest You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

U.S. News delivers quality analysis and clear objective rankings to help you make informed financial decisions.

Advance your career with an online degree

advertisement