5 Key Lessons in August's Jobs Report

A look at the significance of the headline number, the monthly churn, and some unemployment rate quirks

September 3, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (6)

August's jobs report is shining a little light on the ploddingly dreary labor market. Private employers added more jobs than economists expected last month, and the Labor Department revised the data to show bigger private sector gains for June and July. In July, private employers added 107,000 jobs, rather than the 71,000 initially reported. The unemployment rate last month ticked up to 9.6 percent from 9.5 percent in July, reflecting an increase in the size of the labor force.

[See 21 secrets to landing a job now.]

This report offers some important lessons to help understand the current job market and how it's measured. Here are some things to keep in mind:

The headline number often doesn't mean much. The number of jobs lost or gained for the month will always be the first thing reported, but the truth is that it's often a very misleading figure. Let's look at August. Non-farm payroll employment fell by 54,000 jobs—that's the headline figure, and it's negative. More job losses are certainly the last thing anyone wishes to see at this point in the recovery. But if you look deeper, you'll see that the government cut 114,000 temporary census jobs last month. At the same time, total private sector employment increased by 67,000 jobs. Private-sector employment is the real barometer, not the sum of short-term government jobs.

Job numbers are just differences. Often, job data is reported in a way that can be confusing. Let's say a news report says "private sector employers added 67,000 jobs last month." That can sound a bit like all the private businesses in the country made just 67,000 hires altogether last month. In truth, American businesses hired millions of people last month. Consider that in June alone (the most recent month for which there is data) U.S. public and private employers made nearly 4.3 million hires. Retailers alone made 593,000 hires in June. The problem is that people lose or leave jobs in similar volumes. Economists call this "churn," and there's a lot of it—every month.

[See 5 strategies for the 'new normal' job market.]

The long-term unemployed are missing out on the churn. Last month, there were 6.2 million people who had been out of work for six months or more. You might ask, given the millions of hires employers make each month, why some people have been unemployed for a year or two—or more: Wouldn't they eventually get caught up in the churn? This is one of the most troubling aspects of this recession. There could be several reasons. Many of the people struggling with long-term unemployment have found that their skills aren't matching up with what employers are looking for. Also, in general, the longer people are unemployed, the harder it is for them to find work, whether it's because they become stigmatized or because they are gradually become less aggressive job seekers. One possible policy response would be a tax credit for employers that hire a person who has been out of work for six or months or more.

A higher unemployment rate can actually be a good thing. Yes, this sounds ridiculous. Last month, the unemployment rate ticked up 0.1 percentage point to 9.6 percent. "It's worth noting that this was entirely attributable to a spike in the labor force—the household survey actually showed employment up 290,000 in August," Morgan Stanley economists Ted Wieseman and David Greenlaw said in morning note.

[See why your job interviewer's chair could hurt you.]

Consider an economy that's really in the dumps, with employers unwilling to hire. Hopeless job seekers run out of benefits and give up their job search instead relying on the income of a spouse or family member or another form of support. The people quitting their job search drive down the number of officially unemployed and shrink the labor force—and that can drive down the unemployment rate. Consider the opposite: Previously hopeless job seekers begin to see a better local job market, the headlines sound more promising, and their friends are beginning to find jobs, so they head back into the labor market. They pick up the phone and call a contact about an opening they spotted, or they fire off their resume online. They officially move back into the job market, but they aren't employed just yet—they're looking. This can drive the unemployment rate up, but it's a very positive thing for the economy that people are participating in the labor market again.

Back to August: "The labor force increased by 500,000 indicating that people are more encouraged about the labor market and decided to look for work boosting the jobless rate to 9.6 percent from 9.5 percent," says Sung Won Sohn, an economist at California State University-Channel Islands.

[Bookmark the U.S. News Careers page for more top job advice.]

Slow growth will have Washington seeking stimulus. This may be a better-than-expected jobs report, but the job growth is still very small. The economy needs to be adding hundreds of thousands of jobs every month to absorb new people entering the job market and put the unemployed back to work. So lawmakers may be looking for more stimulus. "There is a good chance that the Obama Administration will introduce a set of targeted economic stimulus programs," Sohn says. "Payroll tax relief to encourage new hiring for small businesses is a good possibility. State and local governments are laying off employees as revenue falls. Some assistance from Washington could stem job losses here." Shortly after the release of the August jobs report Friday, President Obama encouraged lawmakers to pass a $55 billion bill that would provide additional loans to small businesses. Housing stimulus may also be coming—along with more unemployment benefit extensions, Sohn says.

Tags:
recession,
employment,
economy,
Obama administration,
unemployment,
Barack Obama,
hiring

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I made a drastic mistake by hiring a guy to my team without consulting my best friend Stephen while he was on a business trip to China. I also hired another friend named Wendy to the same department who was in the job market after getting laid off from another company in town. I learnt many things about the guy I hired from Wendy. After Stephen returned to town I had a private meeting with Stephen and Wendy to find information about the guy I mistakenly hired. After speaking with Stephen and Wendy I realized that I made a mistake by hiring a wrong individual to my team as he did not fit. We tried to convince the guy to leave the company but he never received the message. Then we created an atmosphere for the guy to feel that he does not fit in to our company and forced him out. That worked out for the Dumb Ass to leave my group, but not the company. After leaving my group the Dumb Ass stayed in another group. We still did not like that Dumb Ass as he did not fit to our company. Since I am a fighter, I decided to step in and convince the management to get rid of him once in for all. We planned and fed wrong information to the department’s governing body and the human resources to force the Dumb Ass out of the company tangling him on false charges. The guy was harassed few times by everybody in the management. Management was careful when they were kicking him out. Management created false documents and retained them in his personnel file to justify the guy’s termination. I cannot believe that this strategy to get rid of a guy that I mistakenly hired was really worked but at the end I won.

Roberta Santos-Constantino

Director Casino Solutions

LVSC Information Technology

One Team - Global

Roberta Santos-Constantino of NV 5:19PM September 27, 2010

That's the new reality, that people who have been working towards a *current* degree are more marketable, as are those who are currently employed, yet seeking to switch jobs.

If switching jobs, hiring managers know that someone else deemed the currently employed candidate to be employable (after all, they made it through pre-screening, the required background check, as well as the myriad intelligence and personality-fit-with-the-job testing that is increasingly becoming more prevalent). In short, it sounds like a better risk than assuming someone is out of work because someone laid off an under-performer, or worse, fired the person for cause.

As far as higher education is concerned, older degrees from 10 years ago are simply outdated (the end result of the magnificent recent progress of modern society), so much so that many degree programs won't even accept courses taken over 10 years ago towards their current degree programs.

The moral of the story? Take any job, even part-time, if necessary, so that you are at least considered "employed" when interviewing for better full-time positions, avoid being an under-performer in whichever job it is that you hold, and if your degree is older than 10 years, get into a certificate program, if you must, or a 2 year associate's degree program at a local community college (many "hot" career fields require no more than an associate's degree, especially in healthcare related fields).

The long-term unemployed are going to be the last picks by employers during the slow recovery, so they should seek to accept a part-time job (or combination of two part-time jobs, if possible) to keep from looking less desirable in this market.

No matter what, though, please DO NOT enroll in any of those overpriced, fully-online degree programs from the FOR-PROFIT career colleges or universities. First off, there are many many reputable programs with flexible options for working adults or non-working adults alike from the fully accredited (and more highly regarded) non-profit schools. Secondly, ask yourself if a reputable employer really values a degree that did not require you to work in a face-to-face group setting, as is the case in a real job environment? Every HR person worth his or her salary knows that and takes it into consideration during salary negotiations. You are simply putting yourself at a disadvantage if you appear as though you cannot select a quality program. Have it seen this firsthand, where a working mother got snookered into taking on private loans at sky-high interest rates, ended up in default on student loans, and the school then proceeded to make recorded collection calls to the work department, fully referencing the employee's name and asking that they call regarding tuition account payments. Even if they do not say it is a collection call, everyone knows what's going on. How embarrassing to that single working mother! And how is that going to help them get ahead now that the employer is getting calls in the department at work?

The GAO just completed an investigation of some of the for-profit schools and is reporting on the student loan default rates. Go and look at the default rates, and if they are bad, run run run as fast as you can from these vultures. It's not worth it.

Never Missed a Student Loan Payment of IL 5:27PM September 04, 2010

The unemployment rate needs to include the discouraged worker. The reality is that unemployment is closer to 20%.

Ted Hartman of TX 8:55AM September 04, 2010

Jobs 2020

Who will have a thriving career, and who won't? Find out what will drive America's workforce.

Jobs in 2020 »

Jobs That May Interest You

See Jobs Near You

advertisement

Slide Shows

What Will the Job Market Look Like in 2020?

How will the job market look at the end of this decade?

25 Career Mistakes to Banish for 2013

Remove these mistakes from your repertoire.

10 Wardrobe Musts For Your Next Interview

Tips on what clothing items job seekers need.

Latest Video

advertisement