The Death of the One-Page Resume?

Brevity still packs a punch, but career experts say this age-old rule-of-thumb has fallen out of favor

March 8, 2011 RSS Feed Print

We've long been told to keep the resume to one page. But now that the job hunt has turned digital, job seekers are left wondering: Does that rule-of-thumb still stand?

While the answer depends largely on who you ask, many career coaches, recruiters, and hiring managers agree on something that comes as a shocker to job seekers who have edited, tweaked, and downsized fonts to abide by what was once regarded as a universal rule. If you need more than one page to showcase your fit for a position, they say, you should go for a second one.

"If you have enough experience and credentials to really highlight on two pages, don't short-change yourself," says Vicki Salemi, a recruiter and author of Big Career in the Big City: Land a Job and Get a Life in New York. "It's not the end of the world if you do need to go onto two pages."

[See 9 Tips to Make Your Resume Stand Out.]

Not only is the longer-than-a-page resume not the end of the world, but many recruiters and job-search advisors actually encourage job seekers to continue selling themselves after the page break. Paul Anderson , a Seattle-based career coach, says one-page resumes simply don't have enough content. "I completely advise against [the one-page resume] unless it's a college graduate or someone who's brand-new to the marketplace," he says.

This newfound affinity for page two is largely due to the job market's digital transition. Reading onto a second page now means scrolling down on a computer screen rather than actually turning a piece of paper. And job seekers have more than the human reader to consider; resumes are now at the mercy of computerized applicant-tracking systems. Those databases search not only for keywords, but for frequency of keywords, Anderson says, which means a resume that mentions coveted job responsibilities or skills four times is likely to outrank ones that includes that same keyword only once or twice. And to include keywords repeatedly, you need space—at least two pages, possibly three, he says.

It's not a system that rewards brevity, much to the chagrin of the human hiring managers who are next in line to read applications. That's why bosses like Jerry Hauser, who helps nonprofit leaders with hiring practices as CEO of The Management Center, still appreciate a well-written one-pager. "Partly what I want to know is that you can convey information concisely," Hauser says. "I don't need to know every last detail about each job. Often, the more detail there is, the less real information, because you're not pulling out the most important things you accomplished, which is what I'm really interested in."

That's the same approach advised by Fran D'Ooge, president of Washington, D.C.-based recruiting firm Tangent. Although she says it's now "the norm" for applicants to exceed one page, "the thrust of the one-page rule is still important, which is, keep it as short as humanly possible."

For job seekers in certain industries, however, as short as humanly possible means two or even three pages. That's because academics, as well as specialists in some scientific, technological, and healthcare fields, are expected to include published works, knowledge of various programming languages, or other esoteric skills. For those applicants, condensing to one page signifies lack of experience, which could land their resume in the digital trash.

[See Don't Underestimate the Power of Your Cover Letter.]

With all of this conflicting advice, how are job seekers supposed to figure out how long their resume should be? Though other experts will no doubt beg to differ, Susan Ireland, author of The Complete Idiot's Guide to the Perfect Resume, suggests this neither-hard-nor-fast guideline: Aim for one page if you have less than five years of work experience, and if you have more, consider two pages (so long as you don't work in the industries listed above).

Yet even Ireland, who recognizes that two-page resumes are now widely accepted, recommends keeping it to one page if possible. "It's out of consideration for your reader," says Ireland, who has worked in the career industry since 1989. (Her resume is still one page.) "Take as much work off the reader's shoulders as possible, but still give yourself all the credit that you deserve."

Tags:
employment,
hiring

Reader Comments Read all comments (19)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I interned at the corporate office of a major national retail company and while I was there, I had the opportunity to observe the selection process for interviews for potential employees. Any resume that even exceeded one line onto the next page was IMMEDIATELY thrown out. I believe it is absolutely still a rule that your resume should be one page and one page only. Hiring managers do not have time to read through two or three pages and I think most HR managers will tell you this. It is terrible advise to tell people they can go on to a second, or even third, page!

Kelly of OH 10:42AM January 20, 2012

First the article says that the rule about the one-page resume is antiquated and having a 2 - or even 3- page resume is acceptable. The article continues on to quote hiring managers who believe that the one-page resume is the best. Then the article ends (on the 2nd page no less) with two people who basically say "it's content, not length." What this tells me is: keep the one-page resume since no one has quite decided on whether it's safe to have more pages. I can't read the mind of my hiring manager, while this article was well written, I haven't learned anything by reading it.

Matty of CA 3:46PM May 31, 2011

I found out recently that it's better to be as detailed as possible, too, on the U.S. government jobsite USAJobs.gov.

Originally I had copied & pasted the text from my regular two-page resume into the USAJobs Resume Builder, but learned later that that didn't provide enough detail for HR and hiring managers. I learned this only after actually calling HR people at different federal agencies. More and more job ads are starting to say that, too (to be as detailed as possible). It goes against the grain, I know, to write MORE rather than less in a resume, but for fed jobs it's critical.

I'm fairly certain that HR reps don't even see all the applications, either, since the system software weeds out applications that don't contain keywords from the job ad.

There are still kinks in the federal job application process (still several different systems used, not just USAJobs.gov), but it is improving. USAJobs allows five resumes (I wish they allowed more, actually), so you can store different versions (e.g., for different jobs) or upload a "real" resume (e.g., Word doc). I guess this is a way to hedge your bets. I'm not sure if this is intended mainly for senior officials (because a Word doc looks more professional than the Resume Builder), but for the masses I think it's still advisable to use the Resume Builder because it allows you to include pages of detail.

Early in the resume-building process USAJobs asks you to choose whether or not you want your resume to be "confidential" or "public." Only later do you find out that this means public to "recruiters". Who exactly these "recruiters" are, however, isn't clear. Federal agency recruiters only? Or non-government ones, too? I assume the former, but USAJobs needs to clarify this pronto for those of us who have previous federal experience that was classified.

MS of MN 3:19PM April 17, 2011

Jobs That May Interest You

advertisement

Slide Shows

The 10 Best Jobs

Check out the top tier of our list of The Best Jobs of 2012.

U.S. News Rankings & Research

U.S. News delivers quality analysis and clear objective rankings to help you make informed financial decisions.

Advance your career with an online degree

Latest Video

advertisement