While More Men Are Finding Work, Women Continue to Lose Jobs

Since June 2009, women have lost 117,000 jobs, while men have gained more than 1.1 million

November 8, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Even though the recovery started more than two years ago (in GDP terms), many women aren't feeling the positive effects. While the overall unemployment rate has fallen in recent months to 9 percent, the jobless rate for women has increased during the sluggish recovery.

Between June 2009 and October 2011, the unemployment rate for women increased from 7.7 percent to 8 percent, while the unemployment rate for men dropped more than an entire percentage point, to 8.8 percent, according to a National Women's Law Center analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

[See The 50 Best Careers for 2011.]

"When the recovery started … we saw something quite disturbing," says Joan Entmacher, vice president and director of family economic security at the National Women's Law Center in Washington, D.C. "Men were making modest gains. They were adding jobs, and their unemployment rate was going down. And women were continuing to lose jobs, and their unemployment rate was going up. And that has been the story really since the start of the recovery."

Some economists began to refer to the depths of the recession as a "mancession," since the bulk of the jobs lost were among men in male-dominated industries such as construction and manufacturing. During the recession (defined as December 2007 to June 2009), the economy shed more than 7 million jobs. Men fared worse in the recession, suffering more than 70 percent of the job losses. But strikingly, in the midst of a slow recovery, women have lost 117,000 jobs while men gained 1,140,000—a staggering difference of about a million jobs.

[See Skills Gap Plagues U.S. Manufacturing Industry.]

The tables seem to have turned for a number of reasons, most notably ongoing cuts in public-sector jobs in recent years, which have largely affected women. While the private sector has added more than 2.5 million jobs since March 2010, state and local governments have cut more than 500,000 jobs. "The public-sector job loss has been a big reason why the overall employment numbers have been weak," Entmacher says. "And women have lost the large majority of public-sector jobs, so that's the biggest part of the story."

While women represented just over half (57.2 percent) of the public-sector workforce at the end of the recession, they lost a disproportionate share (63.8 percent) of the 578,000 jobs cut in the public sector between June 2009 and October 2011. Entmacher says that's because relief from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009—more commonly known as the "stimulus" plan—has run out, and that's forcing cash-strapped states to conduct massive layoffs, especially among teachers, a profession that employs a lot of women.

[See The Ranks of the Underemployed Continue to Grow.]

Most worrying, Entmacher says, is the growing jobless rate for subsets of the most vulnerable parts of the population. Between June 2009 and October 2011, the unemployment rate increased for black women (11.7 percent to 12.6 percent) and single mothers (11.7 percent to 12.3 percent).

Entmacher is concerned that the trend in public-sector layoffs will continue because of the division on Capitol Hill. Members of Congress are currently waiting to hear plans from the so-called "supercommittee," which is tasked with coming up with a plan to reduce the nation's growing budget deficit. Entmacher is concerned that the talks will result in more spending cuts. "The big loss in public sector jobs is a self-inflicted wound," Entmacher says. "The gridlock that's going on right now is hurting everybody."

Twitter: @benbaden

Tags:
temporary employment,
careers,
economy,
global economy,
employment

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

So the final tally of the sexes' job losses since December 2007 is this:

Women have a net loss of 2,217,000 jobs.

Men have a net loss of 3,760,000.

But Ben Laden wants us to focus on women's "staggering" losses.

If since December 2007 men had lost 2.2 million jobs and women 3.76 million, I suspect he'd be hysterically demanding a national Hire Women! Act.

For some of the real reasons men are going back to work faster than women, see:

“An In-depth Look at the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act” at http://tinyurl.com/pvbrcu

Male Matters of MI 11:17AM November 29, 2011

Just another typical biased story, pity the poor women losing jobs.

A few years ago there was a magazine cover showing some people who had lost their jobs, funny how they were all women when 78% of the people who had lost their job at that time were men.

To their way of thinking bad should only happen to men, never to women.

Anonymous of CO 5:14PM November 13, 2011

Synopsis of the article:

When the recession hit, men were mostly effected.

The short term stimulus plan did not provide jobs to men, it provided gov't jobs to women.

The "natural" recovery has provided jobs to men, those most effected by the recession, and the short term stimulus has run out, so that the temporary jobs to women that had not been effected by the recession are running out as well.

And some female lawyer has her panties in a twist over this, and Ben Baden has published her nonsensical and stupid opinion as if she were not a complete and total creep.

anon of AZ 10:30AM November 08, 2011

Jobs That May Interest You

advertisement

Slide Shows

The 10 Best Jobs

Check out the top tier of our list of The Best Jobs of 2012.

U.S. News Rankings & Research

U.S. News delivers quality analysis and clear objective rankings to help you make informed financial decisions.

Advance your career with an online degree

Latest Video

advertisement