Are Employers to Blame for the Skills Gap?

In a new survey, workers say they’ve been forced to develop new skills on their own

November 18, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Even with a jobless rate of 9 percent and 14 million unemployed, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported this month that there are currently 3.4 million job openings. While the jobless rate has only fallen slightly from its peak above 10 percent, the number of job openings as reported by the BLS has increased 38 percent since the end of the recession in June 2009.

Labor economists say a skills gap—an imbalance between the skills companies demand and the experience of the U.S. workforce—is partly to blame. Employers in numerous surveys have said they're having trouble finding applicants who fit the requirements for open positions.

[See The 50 Best Careers of 2011.]

A recent survey from The Manufacturing Institute is one example. The Institute found that 67 percent of more than 1,100 manufacturers reported a moderate to severe shortage of available, qualified workers. Of those surveyed, 56 percent said they anticipate the shortage will grow over the next three to five years. Overall, the study found that about 5 percent of current jobs, or up to 600,000 jobs, remain unfilled due to a lack of qualified candidates.

In another survey by the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, 40 percent of the members of the Inc. 500 (a group of the country's fastest-growing companies) reported that the biggest impediment to further expanding their companies is "finding qualified people." Of the companies surveyed, 96 percent said they plan to add employees in 2012, and 41 percent say they expect to hire more than 20 workers next year. The challenge is finding the right employees.

A third survey by the Career Advisory Board at DeVry University of more than 500 hiring managers and nearly 730 job seekers found that 72 percent of job seekers are overconfident and do not possess the necessary skills for the positions they're applying for, while only 14 percent of hiring managers believe job seekers have the qualities needed for their open spots.

[See Skills Gap Plagues U.S. Manufacturing Industry.]

Perhaps employers are partly to blame for the skills gap, according to new research from consulting firm Accenture. The majority of workers (55 percent) report that they are under pressure to develop additional skills to succeed in their current and future jobs, but only 21 percent say they have acquired new skills through company-provided formal training during the past five years, according to a study released Wednesday by Accenture. For the study, Accenture surveyed 1,088 employed and unemployed workers and found that 52 percent have added technology skills in the past five years, but many hadn't updated other in-demand skills such as problem solving (31 percent), analytical skills (26 percent), and managerial skills (21 percent).

Most workers surveyed (63 percent) say they have developed new skills through on-the-job experience. Less than half of respondents (49 percent) report that their employer does a good job of providing a clear understanding of the skills needed for different roles and career paths. "It's going to be critical for organizations to define what new skills they're going to need," says David Smith, managing director for Accenture Talent & Organization. "Organizations haven't really done a good job at articulating the new skills of the future."

Respondents say they have taken it upon themselves to develop skills over time. More than two-thirds of workers (68 percent) believe it is their responsibility to update their skills to ensure their value in current and future roles.

Tags:
careers,
employment,
hiring

Reader Comments Read all comments (17)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Training is a part of the cost of doing business, and business wants everyone but them to pay for training their workforce. Nothing new here. They don't want to pay taxes or unemployment, and they don't want to pay, insure, or pension their workers either. Corporate America wants all of the rights of a person and none of the responsibility. It is capitalism run amok with absolutely no fire wall.

dkmich of NY 6:57PM February 05, 2012

The "skill-gap" and "shortage" of qualified workers statements by many companies is their justification to hire foreign workers. One example: Programmers high up in their fields at fortune 500 and 1000 companies were replaced with talent from India through H1-B Visas.

When you have Bill Gates and others along with companies like his giving millions to foreign schools and giving up on U.S. education system it can only make a person wonder just how much BS money can buy.

Companies who subscribe to the belief that there's a talent shortage here in the U.S. and later hire foreign talent should be made to keep all the job postings and resumes of U.S. candidates for random audits. You will be amazed of the U.S. worker sabotage going on. They won't pay someone to relocate from PA to CA but will pay for someone to move from India to the U.S.!

Wake up people!

Dion of CO 12:34AM December 26, 2011

We need a national program that walks mechanical and manufacturing engineering university graduates through design and manufacturing case studies, with hands-on experience with a variety of manufacturing processes.

I wish I could have participated in such a program when I graduated college. My mechanical engineering university education was much too theoretical. Frankly, my ability to do real-world design engineering is limited by that.

Undergraduate engineering degrees are professional degrees in reality, if not officially. Other professional schools (e.g. law, business) use case studies, but engineers are expected to function without the benefit of a similar collection of experience. This must change.

Unlike, say, software engineering university programs, mechanical engineering curricula typically offer inadequate chances for hands-on learning. I'm guessing that's due to the cost of equipment, energy, materials, and liability insurance. Sure, sometimes a student can land an internship at a company, but that gives a student exposure to only one manufacturing line or engineering business.

Big corporations sometimes have money for training, sometimes they don't. Even if they have money, training means they risk spending a lot of money training people who could quit to work for another company, so those big companies may be reluctant to invest much in training. Keep in mind the kind of training I'm talking about would be extremely expensive, because it would be deliberate­ly diverse and extensive to give engineers many ideas for innovation­.

Also, I've read that new jobs are typically generated by small businesses or brand new businesses­, not big corporatio­ns. How do those businesses get creative and skilled people trained? They can't do it readily.

Some private enterprises do permit students to work in their facilities and learn valuable skills that are not part of typical college curricula - "internshi­ps". They seek out and sometimes pay these students, and have them working side by side with engineers solving real world problems.

But that only gives a student exposure to one manufacturing line or engineering business; I believe that is far too narrow. And those engineers can only pass on knowledge based on their own training and experience, which may be incomplete or confined to a very specialized area.

There is a TV show on the Discovery Channel called How It's Made. If you've seen it, imagine actually visiting the factories they show, instead of watching it on TV. Imagine being coached and doing each step of the process, single-handedly manufacturing the product as much as possible. That's basically what I'm looking for, for the manufacturing part of the training anyway. A discussion of the history and evolution of that process would be a really helpful addition, to understand why the process is set up the way it is.

It seems unlikely that private enterprise factory owners would permit students to actually handle their equipment.

Erik of CA 1:53AM December 17, 2011

Jobs That May Interest You

advertisement

Slide Shows

The 10 Best Jobs

Check out the top tier of our list of The Best Jobs of 2012.

U.S. News Rankings & Research

U.S. News delivers quality analysis and clear objective rankings to help you make informed financial decisions.

Advance your career with an online degree

Latest Video

advertisement