A Plan to Junk the Income Tax

April 14, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

There's some mythology about the ever increasing VAT. Canada has reduced theirs since it was enacted.

Many politicians suggest that what we need to solve revenue problems is to just raise taxes on high-income people.
I don't think we have a need for more revenue in the short term. In fact, we may need lower taxes in the short run if we're in a recession. But because of the aging population and the rise in healthcare costs in coming decades, we're going to have a fiscal problem that will require the government to take a hard look at what it is spending and cut spending in some instances, and we will need to look how to cut spending and will also require higher revenues. The plan puts in place a system where you might be able to get those revenues without courting economic disaster.

The current system does not have much room in it for higher revenue. You can't raise corporate tax rates in the current international economy without harming businesses and workers. The increases in tax rates at the top will produce some revenue, but they don't produce the kinds of revenue that deal with these problems.

In 2040 or 2050, if nothing changes, we're going to have a tax system that can barely fund Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid alone. Something has got to give. We ought to restructure the tax system now to try and get a more competitive economy and more economic growth.

Tags:
income tax,
taxes

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I once got a Forune Cookie which read, "You are waiting for something that will never happen." At the time my third daughter was waiting to be born. she happened.

I am now 81 years old, and I don't think I will wait for the polution loving politicians to act on this.

Frank Little of CA 6:34PM April 15, 2008

Yes, presently for instance, tax rebates are being used by or politicians to encourage spending where they want economic stimulus. For example, rebates on SUV's,,which were encouraged to support the auto industry and gas consumption. It worked, then four years later, we are told that we now have to buy small, gas-saving hybrids, etc. The auto industry and energy companies were both being romanced for political reasons. Now housing. rebates there will be the same, to romance the building and timber industry. Also, got help us if your parents die at the wrong time, as mine did. The inheritance tax took it all, a couple of years later, it would have taken much less. These artificial manipulations by politicians must stop.

Roiberta Vandehey of 4:35PM April 15, 2008

Why Not just enact the FairTax now and just forget about flat taxes and all the others that have been proposed. Every one gets a prebate up to the poverty limit for size of family, all income ,payroll,excise,death,ss,medicare and coporate taxes are [(REPLACED)[ by the 23% imbedded,[(INCLUSIVE)] FAIRTAX rate.

You increase the tax base by any and every one who purchases any NEW item for sale over the poverty level,including items purchased by foreigners who visit our country on vacations. Even our underground economy participants will pay whenever they buy something. Something that cost $100.00 before the FAIRTAX costs the same $100.00 after. You make $1000 a week before the FAIRTAX you might get $700. after our tax structure takes their cut. $1000. a week after FAIRTAX your takehome pay is $1000.

Check it out @FAIRTAX.org. Better yet buy the book and enjoy the read..

Ron Young of IL 11:51AM April 15, 2008

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement