Marriage's Financial Pros and Cons

July 2, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (40)
Toy house and car with engagement ring and cash.

The California Supreme Court's recent decision legalizing gay marriage gives more couples the chance to ask themselves: Should we vow to spend the rest of our lives together?

But before getting swept away with visions of matching tuxes or bridal bouquets, it may pay to ponder the monetary implications of 'til death do us part. Because while marriage—both gay and heterosexual—offers many financial benefits, it comes with potential disadvantages, too. (Only the state-regulated effects, however, apply to married gay couples, because the federal government does not recognize gay marriage.)

Here are eight financial facts about tying the knot:

1) Marriage can result in higher taxes. As the term "marriage penalty" implies, whether they file jointly or separately, married couples can end up paying the government more than they would have had they stayed single. This is especially true for two high earners, explains John Olivieri, a partner in law firm White & Case's private clients practice, because together they can push themselves into a higher tax bracket than they would face as single filers.

2) Marriage can also result in lower taxes. Marilyn Chinitz, matrimonial litigator and partner at Blank Rome, says that the ability to share deductions for children, mortgage payments, and other aspects of a joint life can generate significant savings. Whether these benefits outweigh the potential marriage penalty depends on the couple's situation.

3) Sharing a single health insurance plan typically generates savings. While the rules vary by state and employer, many health insurance companies already offer benefits to domestic partners and same-sex unions; others require marriage for shared coverage. "You will immediately save thousands of dollars in health insurance coverage if you no longer need two separate [plans]," Chinitz says.

4) Spouses don't pay estate tax. One of the trickiest challenges for gay couples is estate planning. While heterosexual spouses can inherit the wealth of their deceased spouses without paying federal estate tax, gay couples do not have that option, Chinitz says. The federal estate tax currently kicks in at $2 million, which includes life insurance payouts.

5) Gifts between spouses are not subject to gift tax. Current law allows people to make gifts of up to $12,000 a year without paying taxes, but gifts to a spouse are generally exempt from that limit, Olivieri says. "The big advantages [of marriage] are no taxes at death and none during life," he says.

6) Marriage can offer financial protections in the case of divorce. When married couples split up, one spouse may be legally required to pay spousal support or alimony to the other. "You have protections [with marriage] that you wouldn't otherwise have," Chinitz says. With no marriage certificate, a breakup doesn't come with any financial payout—which can be seen as a positive or a negative, depending on whether you'd be the receiver or payer.

7) Social Security benefits go to the surviving spouse. Widowed spouses, as well as those who divorced after at least 10 years of marriage, are entitled to their spouses' Social Security benefits if they are greater than their own, says Kathryn Dickerson, a partner with Smolen Plevy, a Vienna, Va., law firm.

8) Property is more easily shared between married partners. Unmarried couples who jointly own a house can find themselves in a sticky situation if they split up, especially if only one person's name is on the title. The other person may have no claim to the property, even if he or she has invested significant amounts of money and labor in redoing the kitchen.

The same is true of a bank account: If unmarried partners who share a single account break up, then all of the money could go to the person who makes the first withdrawal. But for married couples, assets gained during the marriage are typically considered to be jointly owned. (Laws vary by state.) Dickerson says unmarried couples can protect themselves somewhat by making sure both names are on all titles or bank accounts.

Tags:
marriage,
personal finance,
money

Reader Comments Read all comments (40)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Generally I try to keep a positive & fair view & I can agree with all of you on some point about the children comments. However, not all children will become functional adults thus rendering the social security comment a bit unstable in validity. Some will become delinquents that are actually a burden on society, some will have illness & handicaps that will also be a form of societal burden, some will make barely enough to get by & others will be very successful. The environment is also a concern. Too many humans? I think bringing more humans into the world is a HUGE responsiblity, one that more than 1/2 the people in the US don't take as seriously as I think they should. It is also a selfish decision because that new human did not choose to be here so, the parent better do the job to an optimal degree. Reproduction is a choice but it is also an accident in so many cases. Most people can't even talk about sex in balanced healthy manner with their own children let alone adult to adult. If I'm paying more taxes for someone else's child 1 con maybe I cannot save to prepare for my own & now I must rely on someone else to help. 1 pro is, these new humans are the future of my well being as an older person. I want to make them as optimally functional a human as possible so when I'm laying in a nursing home I'm not only getting great care by an intelligent human being but also spending my last days in the delight of a happy well-respected & respecting human being. II agree that government should not be in the role of shaping societal decisions even if as an accidental outcome. I'm not religious & can see positive & negative history involving marriage history. It is not up to anyone else to determine when I can & can not leave a relationship & a parent should be responsible both physically & economically for their children regardless of whether the parents are married or not. As far as taxation, marriage should not determine discounts but neither should health care as I may have to get married to get affordable health care as Business Group of 1 person w/pre-existing conditions.

Heather of CO 9:46PM August 11, 2011

Really? I have no children either but I am not above the public school system. I am sure that you received some benefit of a public education at some point in your life. Do you not agree with paying taxes for paved roads or clean drinking water? It is easy to complain about government and taxes when you are not directly benefiting from the situation, but perhaps you will think differently when you get some water from your sink. Come on.

LHSD of SD 4:24AM October 29, 2010

Make marriage private. Keep it out of the hands of the government. Make it just a private contract between two (or more) people. Rights, privileges, and entitlements between the two can be spelled out in the contract.

Chris of AL 4:35PM September 29, 2010

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement