Why Higher Unemployment Might Not Be a Bad Thing

A rising rate could signal an improvement in the job market as discouraged workers get back in the game

March 24, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (8)

While still painfully high, unemployment has been creeping down gradually since November of last year, igniting hopes of a more robust economic recovery. February's national unemployment rate dipped to 8.9 percent (the lowest in 22 months), and employers added more than 190,000 jobs, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported. However, despite more positive economic indicators and projections that the U.S. economy could grow by more than 2 percent in 2011, some economists say we could see a rise in unemployment—and it might not be a bad thing.

"It's a little bit counterintuitive," says Adolfo Laurenti, deputy chief economist at Mesirow Financial, a diversified financial services firm headquartered in Chicago. "It's a sign that the job market is improving."

[See 11 Tips for Getting Hired in 2011.]

The key question centers on how the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a division of the Department of Labor, calculates the unemployment rate and who's technically counted as unemployed. It's not as simple as just tallying jobless Americans. "The biggest thing is understanding how we arrive at the number, and what the contributing factors are," says Doug Arms, senior vice president at Ajilon, a professional staffing firm.

It starts with what the Department of Labor considers to be the workforce: employed and unemployed civilians 16 years and older. According the Bureau of Labor Statistics the U.S. workforce stood at about 153 million as of February 2011, which translates to about 64 percent of the population being eligible to work.

But from there, it gets tricky. "The crucial factor is the people who—when the job market is weak and it's hard to find jobs—stop looking for jobs," says Laurenti, referring to so-called discouraged workers, or those who have given up on looking for work. Because they're not actively looking for work, discouraged workers drop out of the workforce and aren't counted as unemployed. "It's the overall eligible employee confidence," Arms says. "If I am to look, what is the probability of me finding a job? If they don't feel the probability is high, many won't bother." According to some economists, the high number of discouraged workers during the most recent recession has artificially lowered the unemployment rate, because while these people are still unemployed, they aren't counted as part of the workforce or unemployed.

[See 10 Industries That Will Shed Jobs in 2011.]

That could all change as job seekers' confidence is buoyed by four consecutive months of falling unemployment and a steady stream of relatively positive economic data. "You find that when things are publicized that 'Hey, things are improving,' [it] boosts the confidence level of those that haven't been looking and they start looking," Arms says. "Now you flood the market with eligible job seekers, which, unless there's a massive increase in jobs, can raise the [unemployment] rate pretty drastically."

Despite the steady flow of positive information about the labor market, it's not all smooth sailing from here. Arms cautions that to sustain the numbers seen over the past few months, job creation has to keep pace with the uptick of job seekers. According to a recent Gallup report, as of mid-March, there are still five job seekers for every one full-time position available. "A lack of sufficient job creation to increase employment among those who want to work remains a major obstacle to U.S. economic growth in the months ahead," the report said.

[See Why Companies Are Still Very Nervous.]

According to some economists, the job-creation obstacle might be particularly severe during this recovery because many of the jobs eliminated by the recession simply won't be coming back. "You have at least a couple of areas of structural change in the economy," says Richard Wobbekind, associate dean of the Leeds School of Business at the University of Colorado. "That's what makes bringing the unemployment rate down a challenge." Because of the collapse of the housing market, sectors such as construction are among the job categories expected to take a hit going forward. At its peak, construction accounted for about 6 percent of U.S. gross domestic product, Laurenti says, but after the ravages of the recession, he estimates the sector has been more than halved. "Many people working in that sector will need to find something else," Laurenti says. "They will find something else. The U.S. economy is fabulous at creating jobs. The problem is that now we are facing a little bit of uncertainty—we do not know where the jobs will come from. We're still in this stage of transition."

Tags:
employment,
unemployment,
hiring

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Employment? When will reports of gains in employment show what percentage of them are for 'average to above average income' positions? An individual adult in a major city such as San Francisco or New York will need an average income of around $40,000 per year to be self sufficient at a modest level and that's not saying much considering a modest studio apartment starts at around $2,000 per month if it is to be within 5 miles of work-besides, the cost of a place ideally should not equal more than 1/3rd of your income anyway so even at modest self sufficient income levels shelter in these cities would equal a little more than half of your monthly income!

Part time to full time 'joblets' (ie:fast food, general office, retail and hospitality) that only pay 1/10th to 1/8th of a local cost of living and some for 6 months or less are great for students staying at home with Mommy and Daddy (who likely provide food, shelter, perhaps a car and insurance) but for a single adult are not able to allow for self sufficiency compel the need to seek out public and private assistance for food, shelter, clothing and even transportation thus placing an excessive burden on each as they do now with the millions who take these jobs temporarily until they are able to find self supporting employment!

To add insult to injury, former average to above average income earners over the age of 30 are generally passed over for the teen or 20 something for 'joblets' at fast food, general office, retail and hospitality establishments so that when there is no employer willing to hire, is it any wonder that people say 'There are no jobs?'

PS: My advice to anyone over 30 and laid off as I was due to company closure in the face of industrywide collapse (housing and lending finance) your first week after layoff should be comprised of contacting your circle of influence, if no job is forthcoming 3 weeks later then plan number 2 will be to spend 4 hours per day Monday through Friday online sending your resume tailored to the positions that are similar in skill set requirement, 3 days of those weeks, drive to companies who might need your skill sets and simply ask if they might need the services of a 'and you can fill in the blank' hand the a resume with an introductory cover letter and mention that if they know of anyone in their building who might need someone like you to feel free to pass it along (ALL of my positions were received within 1 to 3 weeks of doing things like this prior to 2008, this 'new normal' we are in is NOT NORMAL!) If by month 3 you are unable to find even so much as a 'joblet' and you used to earn average to above average income STOP looking for work. INSTEAD you need to start a business-if you have the strength offer property cleanup or yard work, if hardly any money do MLM like AVON or an Amway and go door to door, office to office. If more $ seek out business partners and have a business plan!

db of NV 4:21PM April 10, 2011

It may be a good thing if these economists were unemployed!!! Winter in America, Baby!!!

Phillip of CA 5:54PM March 31, 2011

When jobs are created it is really a cost, unless the people who get hired were previously unemployed as well as unemployable. These are two different concepts. If someone is already employable and takes the job, then they are in fact representing an opportunity cost to the economy. So, the next time our politicians claims that creating jobs is in fact a good thing, take a second to realize that usually it is not.

James of IN 6:04PM March 28, 2011

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement