Breaking Down the Debt-Ceiling Debate

What you can expect if the government doesn’t find a middle ground on the debt ceiling

June 7, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

The U.S. government has found itself in the crosshairs of another credit rating agency, as progress on increasing the debt limit continues to stall amid political turmoil.

On Thursday, Moody's Investors Service warned that the U.S. government's AAA credit rating—the highest rating available—could be in jeopardy if significant steps aren't taken to resolve the political impasse over the debt limit. The House rejected a debt-ceiling hike in late May, prolonging the budget standoff between Democrats and Republicans.

"The heightened polarization over the debt limit has increased the odds of a short-lived default," the New York-based credit agency said in a release. "If this situation remains unchanged in coming weeks, Moody's will place the rating under review."

[See 50 Best Funds for the Everyday Investor.]

Moody's warning comes in the wake of Standard & Poor's decision in April to lower the outlook for U.S. debt to negative.

Some critics accuse lawmakers of using the debt ceiling dilemma as a political bargaining chip in the run-up to the 2012 elections, but if this political game of chicken drags on much longer, the U.S. government and taxpayers could face serious repercussions in the form of increased borrowing costs and an erosion of investor confidence in Uncle Sam's ability to manage its finances.

But how much of the debate is political maneuvering and partisan defiance? U.S. News asked the experts to break down the debt-ceiling debate.

What is the debt ceiling? The debt ceiling—currently $14.294 trillion—is the maximum amount of money the government can borrow to finance existing obligations such as Social Security and Medicare benefits, military salaries, and interest on national debt.

Since 1960, Congress has permanently raised, temporarily extended, or revised the debt limit 78 times, according the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

[See the top-rated Vanguard, Fidelity, T. Rowe Price funds from U.S. News.]

The government hit the debt ceiling May 16, but Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has said the country can avoid default until August 2, at which point the United States will exhaust its borrowing authority and default on its debt obligations.

What happens if the debt ceiling isn't raised before August 2? At this point, no one knows exactly what will happen, but the Treasury Department would not be able to borrow any more money. That's a problem because the government borrows money by issuing bonds to bridge the shortfall between revenue and expenses. The government would have to stop, limit, or delay payments on outstanding debt obligations, something Geithner has warned would have "catastrophic economic consequences."

Default by the U.S. government could result in "the loss of millions of American jobs," according to the Treasury, and jeopardize the government's reputation as a credible borrower.

"If we fail to make timely payments on time, the world would not enter a cataclysmic disaster," says Richard DeKaser, deputy chief economist at The Parthenon Group, a Boston-based financial services firm. "The bigger issue is what this does to the reputation of the U.S. government. If investors feel that risk associated is greater [with U.S. debt] than [it is with] the alternatives, the U.S. is going to have to compete a little bit."

[See How to Invest When the Economy Is Weak.]

The U.S. government has enjoyed a relatively unchallenged position as a safe haven among bond investors, but uncertainty about its finances could translate into higher borrowing costs. That means more taxpayer dollars would have to go toward debt service.

While Geithner has imposed an August 2 deadline, experts don't predict a doomsday event. "The question is, how egregiously do they want to 'shuffle the paper' to avoid the consequences," says James Angel, associate professor at Georgetown University's McDonough School of Business. "It's not like August 2 happens and the government is going to shut down. The government can pull all kinds of levers to avoid default as long as there's the political will to do so."

Tags:
debt,
deficit and national debt

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The Interesting thing most do not seem to know is the Fed Government has never, since 1914, paid one thin dime toward paying off it's debt... That's right people, since the Federal Reserve became an entity the Federal Government has borrowed and only paid the interest on what they have borrowed, that is for WWI, the great Depression, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Welfare and every other penny they borrowed. To put this in common language; You get a 'new' credit card and you spend $1000.00 on it the first month. Now you don't pay the principle, (the $1000.00), you only pay the interest (minimum payment). Next month you spend another $1000.00, (now you owe $2000.00) and again you only pay the interest. Do this for 1,164 months in a row. The Federal Government has been doing this longer and with a lot more then $1000.00 per month, but I believe you get the picture. So in essence raising the 'Debit Ceiling' is you not paying your debit, (you would owe only $1,164,000), but getting a new credit card, on top of the one you already have and spending more.

This is what the United States Government has been doing. The 14+ trillion, most of which the politicians know they are not even planning on ever paying is left to charge us interest we are paying and will pay forever, only added to by increased interest rates and spending.

THIS IS WHY WE CANNOT STAND FOR RAISING THE DEBT LIMIT. IT IS THE FORM OF FINANCES WE ARE TAUGHT IS EXTREMELY BAD AND WOULD CAUSE YOU TO BE BANKRUPT!!!

Michael Skarbin of ME 1:38PM July 25, 2011

doomsayer of VA,

Oh, if only what you say were true ... that Social Security and Medicare are paid completely and solely by payroll taxes and the government pension plan is also self-sufficient. For the former to be true 1) payroll taxes must be sufficient to fully pay these obligations, and 2) these obligations must be paid into and out of a different bucket than other spending.

Unfortunately, neither is true. By the White House's own 2011 budget, revenue from payroll taxes is $934B, but Social Security and Medicare outlays are $1.2T.

(So, if/when you hear politicians or pundits say these programs are solvent, they're lying.)

"Officially," payroll taxes are paid into OASI and DI Trust Funds. So, you might think it's a different and separate bucket. Not really. By law, payroll taxes must be invested in U.S. "special securities" than earn a formula-based rate of return. The cash exchanged for the securities is deposited in the General Fund and is indistinguishable at that point from other cash in the General Fund.

Social Security/Medicare disbursements are paid each month by redeeming or selling those invested securities. The cash from that sale comes from the General Fund.

The simple fact is that Social Security and Medicare are paid into and out of the General Fund through the Social Security Trusts. They aren't separately managed buckets.

(Again, if/when you hear politicians or pundits say these programs are paid out of separate funds, they are being deceptive, at best.)

As for the Federal Employee Retirement System, government employees contribute only 0.8% of their pay to the system, while their agencies contribute 11%. Gov't employees may also participate in a Thrift Savings Plan that includes a 5%, immediately vested match by their agency. The FERS is significantly a non-contributory retirement plan. The money the agency contributes to the FERS is part of their budget, which is part of the discretionary portion of the Federal budget and are paid for like everything else through revenue (taxes primarily) or debt.

Regrettably, doomsayer of VA, all these programs contribute to the annual deficit and the national debt.

That's why they absolutely ARE part of the debt

Crash of TX 12:50PM June 30, 2011

It's time for the government to live within it's means. American families have to stay within their budgets. Government should do the same thing.

customeradvantage.com

Site ID: newstart

John of NY 12:47PM June 13, 2011

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement