How to Calculate Your Retirement Number

The first step to creating a retirement-savings plan is to do some math

February 1, 2012 RSS Feed Print

If you know how much money you need in the bank to comfortably retire, you're in the minority: Only 1 in 10 people make such a calculation, according to the Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies. That might explain why, on average, Americans are on track to replace 60 percent or less of their income during retirement. Financial advisers generally agree that retirees need to replace 80 percent or more.

[50 Ways to Improve Your Finances in 2012]

That means someone who brings home an $80,000 salary at the peak of his working years should save enough before retirement to generate at least $64,000 a year post-retirement. An investment, such as an annuity, that generates a 3 percent annual return would require savings of at least $2.1 million to throw off that sum annually. (Retirees can also supplement their income by continuing to work, as well as with Social Security payments and pensions.)

For those who fail to stash enough away in advance, the consequences can be dire: The federal government estimates that 12 percent of women and 7 percent of men over age 65 live in poverty. Couples fare better than single seniors; the poverty rate is highest among divorced and widowed women, at 21 percent at 15 percent, respectively.

In fact, more than half of Americans report having less than $25,000 in savings and investments, according to the Employee Benefit Research Institute, a nonprofit research organization. Just 13 percent of workers now say they are "very confident" that they will have a comfortable retirement. The first step to joining that more self-assured group is to figure out just how much money you'll need. Here are six easy ways to do just that:

1. Use a calculator. Online retirement calculators can estimate for how much you should have in the bank before retirement. Figure out if you're on track, based on current savings rates, or if you need to ramp up. "That first calculation is as frightening as it is a good one to scare you half to death on how much you have to save if you live to 90," says Nobel Prize winner and Stanford professor William Sharpe.

[See the 10 Best Places to Retire in 2012.]

2. Take a shortcut to generate a ballpark figure. John Ameriks, head of Vanguard's investment counseling and research group, recommends estimating the amount you need in retirement by multiplying your current salary by 12. "People shouldn't get too comfortable until they have a number that's 12 or more times their current salary, so $600,000 for $50,000," he says.

3. Save 18 percent. That's the savings rate a medium-earner ($43,084 in 2010) would need if he or she starts saving at age 35 and plans to retire at age 68 (assuming a 4 percent return on investments), according to the Boston College's Center for Retirement Research. The Center issued a brief that provides savings rates need based on a variety of factors, including retirement age, rate of return, income, and age that contributions begin. (The savings rates would allow retirees to replace 80 percent of their working salaries and calculations factor in Social Security income.) The Employee Benefit Research Institute reports that on average, employees contribute just 7.5 percent of their income into their retirement accounts.

The analysis found that the two most important factors for creating a retirement nest egg are one's savings rate and the age of retirement. "If people could work until they're 70, they would have a much higher chance of having a secure retirement. Social Security is higher if you wait until age 70, and it gives your 401(k) assets a longer chance to grow, and it reduces the number of years you have to support yourself," says Alicia Munnell, the center's director. Less important was the rate of return earned on investments.

[How to Save Enough for Retirement]

Tags:
401(k),
personal finance,
retirement,
IRA,
social security,
money,
senior citizens

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Perhaps that is why the Government is steadily trying to raise the eligible age of 65 for Social Security to age 70! "It reduces the number of years you have to support yourself!"

Fanni of PA 2:40PM February 15, 2012

Investing for the long-run is NOT rocket science, but, it does take a strategic investment plan and the will and resolve to stick with it and "stay-the-course" as the familiar Vanguard mantra states. With a strategic asset allocation between stocks/bonds/commodities/real estate/cash and a periodic re-balancing, those with the perseverance to stay with the plan can surmount and avoid the emotional whipsawing that the market inevitably delivers. Again, it is not rocket science, it is actually more common sense, and the realization of a few key investment realities, namely, low costs do matter to long-run returns, the vast majority of actively managed accounts cannot surpass the long-run returns of broadly diversified market index funds, and, very, very few people have the skills or luck necessary to "beat-the-market" consistently over the long haul.

Ken Derow

Ken Derow of PA 10:02AM February 15, 2012

My partner wants to cash in his retirment for a lump sum and buy a home for cash in another

state , he is 60 years old and we live in the home that we are buying but won't be able toafford to keep when he retires from work in about 5-6 years.My question is can this been done and what are the penitilies?

Carol of CA 9:25PM February 04, 2012

U.S. News Rankings & Research

U.S. News delivers quality analysis and clear objective rankings to help you make informed financial decisions.

advertisement

Follow U.S. News Money

Latest Video

advertisement