• Comment (1)

Why You Should Launch a Side Gig Now

Earning money on the side provides job insurance amid uncertainty

March 27, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Does becoming your own boss sound tempting? If it does, you're hardly the only one: Research by Federal Reserve economist Ellen Rissman finds that men are almost twice as likely to become self-employed when they are already unemployed. Working for themselves is temporary, however. Within one year, about 2 in 10 workers return to paid employment.

Overall, the self-employment rate dipped a bit during the most recent recession, although it still remains close to 11 percent, where it has hovered for most of the past decade. Steven Hipple, economist at the Bureau of Labor Statistics, says that while some people are drawn to self-employment as a way to avoid unemployment, there are also many self-employed businesses, in retail or construction, for example, that went under during the recession. That's why the net effect appears to be a slight decline in self-employment, explains Hipple.

But don't let those numbers discourage you. Going against the tide and starting your own business in a tough job market not only lets you escape from the corporate grind, but it also can be easier than it would be during boom times. Here are five reasons to consider going solo now:

Extra protection from dreaded pink slips. In 2004, when Susie Fougerousse was a stay-at-home mother of two, she realized that she loved decorating her children's rooms and thought she could make a business out of it. She noticed that it was hard to find pieces she liked in nearby stores, so she launched an online business that sells upscale furniture and décor. While the $10,000 in start-up costs was scary at first, she says starting a business is what ended up saving her family financially.

The company, Rosenberry Rooms, is now a multimillion-dollar business, while her husband's former industry, textiles, has all but dried up. "It's a huge blessing," says Fougerousse, who lives in Cary, N.C. "He would have lost his job with how things went in that industry. You think you're on the safe track [by working at a big company], but that turned out to be the most risky," she says. Her husband now works full time on Rosenberry Rooms as well.

"It feels very beneficial to have multiple income streams right now," says Michelle Goodman, author of My So-Called Freelance Life: How to Survive and Thrive as a Creative Professional for Hire, who has worked as a freelancer for almost two decades. "With a full-time job, if you get laid off, that's the whole thing. But if I got laid off from one of mine, I could still have 50 percent of my income left," she says.

But just because earning money on your own provides income doesn't mean you should ditch your day job just yet. Pamela Skillings, author of Escape From Corporate America and a career coach, recommends moonlighting on the side to test the waters before becoming self-employed full time. She says that approach lets you find out, "Is it something you want to do full time? Does it have market potential?"

You set your own income. If you're working for the man, you have little control over your salary. All you can do is request a raise, which can be turned down. But Skillings says as someone who is self-employed, "I have full control to shift and come up with a great idea or find a new client. I could double my income with one good idea or connection."

Your start-up costs are lower. "The cost of failure right now to start a company or start something entrepreneurial is very low," says Tim Ferriss, entrepreneur and author of The 4-Hour Workweek. Since the economic situation is so tough, no one would think less of someone who started a company and failed, since so many are failing, he says. He also points out that networking sites Facebook and LinkedIn were both started during the "dot-com depression" of 2000 to 2001. Plus, he adds, advertising and service providers are cheaper because everything is on sale.

Tags:
employment,
business,
money,
income

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

This may well work in places like the US or the UK, but in Finland (where I live), this is a way to work more and get paid less, per unit time that you work.

How does this work?

1- If you have a job already, you get a salary and you get to pay taxes on your income. These are deducted at source. You will usually pay about 19 - 30% on your gross income, depending on your salary level and any modifying circumstances that would mitigate against higher tax costs.

So you take a second job on the side, working independently, and you will pay 50% of that money to the government in taxes. For every euro you earn, you will lose 50 cents. This makes it a poorly-viable option to go into a second job as self-employed.

2- If you are not in a steady job, then your incentive to do part-time work self-employed or for anyone else is even lower. Your income support with be reduced by 50%, and the tax you pay will amount to more than 50% of what is left. Eventually, you arrive at a point where you do some work for, say, 1000 euros during a 28 day period, and you get paid, and you declare your earnings. This is automatic since it goes into your bank account, and the Social Insurance Institution gets to look into that if you are unemployed.

When you get that money, you have your full income support and the next month, you find you have lost 500 euros of your insome support. You then get a tax bill for the taxes on your earnings - that's about 300 euros.

You worked 28 days for 200 euros. And the money you have to live on is very small for a month: 100e + 200e = 300e =/= an amount upon which you can actually live in Finland!

Nick 1:08AM May 23, 2012

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement