• Comment (2)

5 Things to Know About New Debit Card Fees

New regulations cap the fees charged on debit card transactions, but consumers don’t always benefit

May 1, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Ever since the Dodd-Frank Act required the Federal Reserve to issue rules on interchange fees, or the fees card companies charge merchants for transactions, the average transaction cost on debit cards has been cut in half. The Fed capped the transaction fee according to a formula that brings most fees down to less than a quarter. The average debit card transaction, which the Fed reports is $38, would carry a 24 cent fee, for example.

Before the new rule, those transaction costs had been hotly debated: Merchants argued that card companies were unfairly overcharging them, while the card companies argued that the fees were justified by the services they offer in return, such as easy payment collection.

Here are five things shoppers should know about the fees:

The fee pays for convenience. Card issuers "are providing a service, not just to cardholders but to merchants, and it's reasonable that there's a fee associated with that," says Ron Shevlin, senior analyst at Aite Group, a research and advisory firm. In other words, customers can walk into almost any store, anywhere in the world, and use plastic to fund their purchase. Retailers, in turn, are able to offer their shoppers a variety of payment options. Those perks require networks that cost money to run.

You're not necessarily paying the fees—merchants are. That's why merchants are complaining so vocally about them. Interchange fees can be an expense on par with payroll and rent, according to the National Association of Convenience Stores.

There's some debate over whether or not merchants simply pass the cost directly on to consumers. One study of what happened in Australia after the government regulated interchange fees found that it was impossible to determine whether merchants passed on price reductions to customers, partly because prices are determined by so many factors. (The study was funded by MasterCard and performed by an independent economic consulting firm.) Merchants generally insist that shoppers are the ones who are ultimately paying for the interchange fees, while the card industry says retailers simply bank the difference.

Interchange fees tend to be lower in other countries—at least prior to the new regulation. A report released by merchants and retailers reported that before the regulation went into effect, fees in the United States were among the highest in the world—higher than the fees in Canada, Europe, and Britain.

When interchange fees go down, other fees can go up. After Australia restricted interchange fees, the study funded by MasterCard found that annual fees charged on credit cards went up by 22 percent on standard cards and by 47 to 77 percent on rewards cards. That's because when card companies face dwindling revenue from one source, they often look for ways to make up for it from other sources, for example through new account fees.

In fact, the video rental service Redbox announced in October of last year that it had to raise prices by 20 percent ($1.20 from $1.00 for a daily standard rental), largely because the interchange fee changes lead to higher operating expenses.

Card companies are not happy with the new rules. Through the industry group Electronic Payments Coalition, card companies fought hard against the new interchange fee rules, but they ultimately couldn't stop the new regulations. Since the Fed's new rule went into effect in October 2011, the coalition has released data on the negative impact: It says merchants are not passing on any savings to consumers, but instead are charging the same prices and pocketing the difference.

The group says the changes resulted in an $8 billion windfall to the retail industry. "There continues to be no evidence that retailers are passing along savings from this windfall—even at gas stations, where debit is the overwhelmingly most popular form of payment," reports the coalition.

Fee restrictions, it turns out, are often far more complicated than they first appear.

Twitter: @alphaconsumer

Tags:
personal finance,
credit cards,
banking,
money

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Here are a few points that Ms. Palmer fails to report:

1) The Reserve Bank of Australia completely rebutted the claims made in the Master Card study. In a 2008 preliminary review of the reforms, the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) concluded that despite difficulties of measurement, cost savings from interchange fee reforms “have been passed on to consumers in the form of lower prices for goods and services than would have otherwise been the case. Despite difficulties of measurement, "the Board’s judgment remains that the bulk of these savings have been, or will eventually be, passed through into savings to consumers . . . The Bank’s estimate is that over the past year, these cost savings have amounted to around $1.1 billion.'" Here's the link to the citation.

http://www.rba.gov.au/payments-system/reforms/review-card-reforms/pdf/review-0708-pre-conclusions.pdf. Pgs. 22 23.

2) The fees don’t pay for convenience. Many times the same card gets used in the same way to access the same money from the same account and the bank pays interchange – it’s called an ATM transaction. There is no reason for interchange on debit (there is none on checks and they are a more expensive convenience for banks to provide). Ron Shevlin, who is quoted in the article, is simply wrong on that.

3) The Redbox example is completely wrong. Its fee didn't go up because debit fees went down. That happened because the Fed didn’t follow the law and let Visa and MasterCard raise fees on transactions under $15 – the kind RedBox gets. That shows that high swipe fees are paid by consumers.

4) The EPC "data" is not taken from any legitimate study – or any study at all. It is bogus, based on nothing. They just assumed that any savings weren’t factored into pricing. They did no other analysis on the gas prices they refer to at all. Retailers always pass along savings. They are competitive with each other, unlike the credit card companies that, along with the banks, price fix the swipe fee.

5) The Federal Reserve report found that the percentage share of total transactions for both PIN and signature stayed almost the same. In other words, merchants aren’t discriminating against small bank cards even though they have higher interchange. The merchants and retailers said they would never do this, and this is proof that the retail community has kept its word.

Karen Hinton

Merchants Payments Coalition

Karen Hinton of DC 5:48PM May 11, 2012

Congress again has implemented price controls which history has proven to ultimately fail in the US. Instead of allowing the free market to charge merchants for services they freely demand, our elected representatives chose a calculation formula that is unrealistic.

If Congress required the Post Office to follow the same formula, we would be paying $6 to mail a letter. Instead, the PO is allowed to lose $5 billion each year which the TAXPAYER subsidizes. Here the merchants receive more income and the consumer sees none of it passed on. Congress should stop involving themselves in the private sector especially since they do not understand the business. After all, do you really think government can do things better than the private sector?

Rick of IN 1:58PM May 03, 2012

advertisement

rounded corners

Slideshows »
10 ‘Digital Utilities’ You Need Every Day

Latest Video

advertisement