Diversification: Can You Have Too Much of a Good Thing?

Spreading your bets widely helps keep a lid on risk and volatility, but can you go too far?

February 17, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (1)

Evaluate your portfolio. How do you know if you're overdiversified? Find out by taking a long, hard look under the hood of your portfolio, paying special attention to the types of investments you have. Chen recommends reconstructing your portfolio by asset class, drilling down into the contents of each fund you own. (Richards says tools like Morningstar's Instant X-Ray can help.) That way, you can pinpoint areas where you have too much concentration or not enough. For example, determine how much emerging markets or inflation-protected bond exposure your investments collectively provide by looking at the asset class breakdown of each fund.

Chen says investors should concern themselves more with the number of asset classes they have as opposed to the number of funds. "For the typical investor, if you have 10 to 15 asset classes covered, that's plenty," Chen says. "Then you say, 'OK, I want to cover 10 asset classes, so how many funds do I need to achieve that goal?' I would say if you have a 10-asset-class portfolio, maybe 20 funds."

[For more investing and money advice, visit U.S. News Money, or find us on Facebook.]

If you have more funds than that, it might be worth reviewing the investment objectives of each to see if significant investment-style or asset-type overlap exists, which can cause problems like overexposure to a particular sector and concentration of risk. If you find you have multiple funds with the same objective and similar performance, shed the less compelling ones and go with the cheaper choice, says Rob Hoxton, president and CEO of Shepherdstown, W. Va-based Hoxton Financial. He also cautions investors to be mindful of "style drift"—that mutual fund you bought years ago might not be the same, style-wise, today. "Maybe a particular fund claims to be a value fund, but when you pull the covers back and really take a look, it looks more like a growth fund," Hoxton says.

Above all, make sure your investments aren't past their prime. Investors commonly fail to reevaluate their asset mix to ensure that certain funds are still relevant and working toward their financial goals. "Compare it to a hot air balloon. If you keep putting things in the basket, the balloon is going to sink," D'Arruda says. "People should get rid of one [investment] before they buy another. You need to be more of a picker and less of a collector."

Twitter: @mmhandley

Tags:
funds,
stocks,
investing,
mutual funds

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The risk inherent to the entire market or entire market segment - Interest rates, recession and wars all represent sources of systematic risk because they affect the entire market and cannot be avoided through diversification. Whereas this type of risk affects a broad range of securities, unsystematic risk affects a very specific group of securities or an individual security. Systematic risk can be mitigated only by being hedged.

(Source: Investopedia)

Too much of a good thing, or not enough of The Right thing?

The market normal is not what it used to be. 2008 & 2009 showed that everything can become correlated and the 'flash crash' shows that they can do it very quickly. So, regardless of how many layers of allocation or diversification are applied, the tremendous pressures on the market today generate a risk level that is much greater than what allocation & diversification can mitigate. If your portfolio does not include some sort of hedge, like a Defined Risk Strategy, you have no way to defend or limit the systematic risk that looms large in today's market.

Drew of TX 3:50PM February 18, 2011

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement