What Happens After QE2 Ends?

The Fed’s highly controversial QE2 program is scheduled to end in June

March 15, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (13)

The Federal Reserve's second round of quantitative easing, which began in November and is commonly referred to as QE2, is slated to end in June. Experts expect the Fed to finish the program, in which it pledged to buy $600 billion worth of treasury bonds to keep interest rates low and help spur lending and economic growth. There has been much speculation about what will happen in the markets—stock, bond, as well as commodities—when the Fed ends QE2 and the economy is left to stand on its own without any stimulus.

Proponents say the economy is better off because of the program, while inflation hawks say it has propped up asset prices across the board. They caution that markets are in for a reckoning after the Fed program winds down. Here are a few possible scenarios for the markets after QE2 ends:

[See top-rated funds by category ranked by U.S. News Score.]

Bond yields continue to rise. Even with QE2 in place, treasury yields have slowly moved higher. On Nov. 4, 2010, the day of the Fed's announcement, the 10-year treasury yield stood at 2.5 percent. Today, it yields about 3.4 percent. Bond guru Bill Gross, who manages the world's largest mutual fund, PIMCO Total Return, is forecasting a spike in treasury yields. Gross has sold off all of the T-bills in his flagship fund because of his concerns about the end of QE2. In his investment outlook for March, Gross writes, "Bond yields and stock prices are resting on an artificial foundation of QE II credit." He adds: "Who will buy [t]reasuries when the Fed doesn't?" The Fed has been buying an average of about $75 billion in bonds a month since it instituted the program in November. Critics say that by buying large amounts of bonds, the Fed has kept rates artificially low. Gross estimates the 10-year treasury yield is about 1.5 percent lower than it should be when viewed in historical context, and when compared with expected nominal GDP growth of 5 percent.

Some experts are less concerned about a dramatic run-up in treasury rates. After the Fed exits, "you wouldn't have a big buyer, but it's still not the same as them selling them," says Stacey Schreft, director of investment strategy for The Mutual Fund Store. "You could see a small jump [in yields]." The Fed also has the option to reinvest proceeds from its purchases, which means it may not completely exit the market. Whether the Fed continues to reinvest or slowly lets the holdings roll off its balance sheet will be something to watch in the coming months.

Stocks could take a hit. The S&P 500 has risen about 6 percent since the Fed launched QE2. "Financial assets have become much more valuable when interest rates are so low," says Thomas Winmill, manager of the Midas Fund, which primarily invests in companies involved in the mining and production of metals like gold, silver, and platinum. "When interest rates are high, they might not be so valuable."

[See Why Big U.S. Stocks Look Like a Good Bet.]

How the wind-down is perceived by investors is also important. "If the market takes it as a sign of confidence in the economy, that's a good sign," says Bob Gelfond, CEO of MQS Asset Management. "On the other hand, if [investors are] worried that yields are now going to start heading up, that could be a negative for the stock market." Higher yields are generally associated with an economic recovery, but a quick jump could impact stocks negatively.

Still, others contend that the market has already priced in the effect of the end of QE2 and stocks are bound for higher gains. "My guess is that stocks will be higher after June by the end of the year than they are today," says Brian Gendreau, market strategist with Financial Network. But he warns that the stock market never moves in a straight line and that there are always bumps along the way.

Rally in commodities slows. Commodities have also benefited during the Fed's easing program. Gold still trades around $1,400 per ounce, and silver is hovering around historic highs of about $35 per ounce. Oil is now trading around $100, which some attribute to unrest in the Middle East. Winmill expects gold's run to continue, but he's concerned that silver's streak may end. That's because it's primarily used for industrial purposes, and higher interest rates could stunt economic growth, Winmill says.

[See What's Next for Gold?]

Soaring food prices have become a concern in emerging markets like China, India, and Brazil. Critics place some of the blame for higher food prices on the Fed's program, and they're worried that the end of QE2 may not be enough to stem rising inflation abroad. If the Fed decides to end its easing programs, one thing will remain the same: The Fed funds rate is still set at virtually zero, where it's been since December 2008. "[Fed] policy is still going to be easy, and that's probably not going to be helpful for the dollar, and it's probably not going to put a cap on commodity prices, unless the world economy starts having a downturn," Gelfond says. The dollar remains the world's reserve currency—meaning that many commodities throughout the world are priced in dollars—and a weak dollar has effects throughout the world, Gelfond says. He says a stronger dollar could help slow some inflationary pressures throughout the world.

Twitter: @benbaden

Tags:
recession,
Federal Reserve,
investing,
Ben Bernanke,
economic stimulus

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I read your article and I want to say that there are a few issues when it comes to the distribution of goods. Most people overlook a very vital aspect of prices. Not only does it denote the "value" of a good, but it is a signal of its demand and supply. Prices go up and down, not just because of corporate whim, but in response to supply and demand. An economy that is based on the lack of prices will find that demand is unlimited, and will lead to shortages and mass scarcity. Additionally, a "as needed" basis of distribution fails to look at the incentive of the supplier to actually supply goods. If a "supplier" exists, why should I invest in the enterprise of supplying things if I can be an "as needed" consumer.

What is honestly wrong with the monetary system is that we ascribe value to sheets of paper that are monopolized by a single printer (namely the Federal Reserve). When people stated that gold standard had problem, it wasn't due to the nature of gold itself, but to the printing of the dollar representation of gold.

Bretton woods broke down not because it was flawed, but because it was too strict. The influx of printed dollars to fund activities that gold alone could not pay for lead to a bubble that collasped. The bubble is created by the artificial tampering of the marketplace by raising and lowering interest rates and the supply of dollars without acknowledgement of the scarcity of the goods (gold or silver) that were to back the dollar.

Honestly, the price of gold in recent times is a reflection of this. Although it is no longer currency for the us and most of the world, its reaction to inflation is still the same (in general rises with inflation, falls with deflation -- a store of value through time when adjusted).

I'm not a blind advocate of the gold standard, but what is needed is stable currency. Gold standard was not stable due to the greed of those who needed to wage wars, create social welfare programs, and finally corporate welfare programs.

Under a gold standard, it would be impossible to spend beyond your means except by deception, but bubbles would still erupt. Now under fiat currency, we can fund everything we want, but at expense to the political stability of a country, and the mis-allocations of the market place.

Using Money is better than relying on ad hoc supply and distribution controls (emphasis on control). It leads to the use of force to create prosperity which means tyranny. Monetary systems work when you remove coercive facets from the economy (gov't structures that dictate rather than create transparent marketplaces, etc.)

Matthew Blackmon of NC 4:16PM August 19, 2011

Manufacturing, manufacturing and manufacturing. Ancillary, ancillary and ancillary manufacturing. Jobs, jobs and jobs.

Makooch of IL 1:17PM August 07, 2011

Several decades ago, Margaret Thatcher claimed: "There is no alternative". She was referring to capitalism. Today, this negative attitude still persists.

I would like to offer an alternative to capitalism for the American people to consider. Please click on the following link. It will take you to an essay titled: "Home of the Brave?" which was published by the Athenaeum Library of Philosophy:

http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/steinsvold.htm

John Steinsvold

John Steinsvold of NY 10:28PM June 30, 2011

advertisement

rounded corners

Slideshows »
10 ‘Digital Utilities’ You Need Every Day

Latest Video

advertisement