Companies with the Most Older Workers

These Fortune 500 companies employ the most workers age 50 and over

May 31, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (11)

As baby boomers begin to approach traditional retirement age, the workforce is aging rapidly. But not all industries are aging at the same rate. Some companies employ significantly more older workers than others.

Just over a quarter (26 percent) of employees at Fortune 500 companies are age 50 or older, according to a new RetirementJobs.com study. However, the proportion of older workers at individual Fortune 500 companies ranges from 6 percent at AECOM Technology to 39 percent at American Airlines, the analysis of public records and employer surveys found. Airlines, utilities, and insurance companies generally have the largest proportion of older workers, while food and beverage companies typically employ primarily young employees.

[See The 100 Best Mutual Funds for the Long Term.]

Just because a company employs a large number of older workers doesn't necessarily mean it's hiring older workers. In many cases, companies have long-tenured employees who have aged on the job, says Bill Coleman, vice president of research and certification at RetirementJobs.com and author of the report. But the study "does give a sense of where older workers are and where many of them would be most comfortable," he says.

When a company has a large proportion of workers in a given peer group, workers of the same age may be more likely to fit in with the culture of the organization. "Consider this as a way of vetting or considering the likelihood you would get a job and be comfortable in the environment," says Coleman. "[These employers] understand older people and their value and benefits and they are not favoring younger workers." Many of the organizations with a lot of older workers have a strong union presence, which could help protect workers with the longest job tenure from layoffs. "When they have had layoffs and they use seniority as the basis for that, it will appear that they have a preference for older workers," says Barry Bluestone, a political economy professor and director of the Dukakis Center for Urban and Regional Policy at Northeastern University, who is not affiliated with the RetirementJobs study.

[See the top-rated Vanguard, Fidelity, and T. Rowe Price funds from U.S. News.]

Forest products company Weyerhaeuser, where approximately 37 percent of employees are age 50 or older, has made a conscious effort to retain older workers. "We view it as a competitive advantage to have people with more experience because there is a great deal of knowledge and expertise that goes into our field," says Bruce Amundson, a spokesperson for Weyerhaeuser. "We have developed retention plans and benefits packages that we offer to incent people to stay in the workforce longer." However, the company also realizes that the baby boomers will eventually retire and will have to be to be replaced by younger workers. "There are opportunities for a young, high-potential person to come in here and see their career path move up much quicker than if they were among peers their own age group," Amundson says.

Companies without many older workers aren't necessarily making a deliberate effort not to hire them, says Coleman. "The reason those companies rate low on the list is because of the nature of what they do or the nature of their organizations," he says. "Places like Goldman Sachs have large numbers of young employees because they bring in large pools of people just out of college or just out of business school." Logistics company C.H. Robinson Worldwide, where just 12 percent of employees are age 50 or older, hired 450 new employees in the first quarter of this year. "We target entry-level, recent college graduates because our pay and positions are entry-level, but we'll hire anyone that has an interest in sales," says Eric Mesenburg, director of recruiting for C.H. Robinson Worldwide. "We typically hire entry-level and then promote from within."

[See 5 Characteristics of a Good 401(k) Plan.]

Younger employees could use this list to find companies where older workers will be retiring, which means openings for advancement. "Firms see their workforce aging and they want to make sure they have a good team behind them," says Bluestone. However, older employees increasingly need and want to continue to work, so there is no guarantee that baby boomers will retire in the near future. "There are probably going to be more people leaving those firms where the prevailing retirement plan is a defined-benefit pension rather than a 401(k)," says Carl Van Horn, a public policy professor and director of the John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development at Rutgers University. "When you have the presence of a strong defined-benefit pension plan they have a financial incentive to retire that a person with a defined contribution plan doesn't have."

Here are the Fortune 500 companies that employ the most and least older workers:

Fortune 500 Companies with the Most Older Workers

1. American Airlines; 39.157 percent of employees are age 50 and older

2. Eastman Kodak; 38.420 percent

3. TravelCenters of America; 38.387 percent

4. Delta Air Lines; 37.688 percent

5. United Airlines; 37.648 percent

6. Weyerhaeuser; 36.877 percent

7. Edison International; 36.225 percent

8. Northeast Utilities; 36.127 percent

9. Smithfield Foods; 35.948 percent

10. United Services Automobile Association; 35.459 percent

Fortune 500 Companies with the Least Older Workers

1. AECOM Technology; 6.041 percent of employees age 50 and older

2. Auto-Owners Insurance; 9.802 percent

3. Goldman Sachs Group; 11.331 percent

4. C.H. Robinson Worldwide; 12.042 percent

5. Google; 12.855 percent

6. Electronic Arts; 13.620 percent

7. Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold; 14.216 percent

8. Chesapeake Energy; 14.269 percent

9. Nordstrom; 14.269 percent

10. Consol Energy; 14.278 percent

Source: RetirementJobs.com

Twitter: @aiming2retire

Tags:
employment,
careers,
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (11)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

We need alot more companies who are willing to ivest in the older worker. Not all of us who are single/O and 55+ (babyboomers see the defintion) have the option to take early retirement.

Karen Blyth of GA 8:33PM July 19, 2012

I difference is that some industries may try to retain older workers but I can't think of one that considers it an advantage in new hires.

Sissie of NC 10:35AM June 10, 2012

Wouldn't it be nice if we could retire. A depressed stock market, secure investments paying less than the cost of inflation, dead real estate, real threats to social security reductions - all characteristics of the retirement income scenario that baby boomers face.

Jack of DC 6:06PM July 27, 2011

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement

How to Live to 100

Why do some people live long, healthy, and happy lives, while others struggle with dementia, heart disease, and depression? Learn how to protect yourself from those outcomes based on the latest research on health, longevity, happiness, and finances in the U.S. News ebook.