• Comment (2)

The Recession's Impact on Baby Boomer Retirement

Workers on the verge of retirement continue to be worse off than before the recession

October 31, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Few options to recoup losses. Individuals on the verge of retirement have little time to accumulate additional retirement savings. Older adults may have to reconsider when they retire or how much income they can expect in retirement. GAO reports that stocks, on average, have not fully recovered from their low point during the recession and housing prices have also not recuperated. "It used to be that your best retirement investment was your home," says Rich Morin, a senior editor for the Pew Research Center. "As people saw after the housing market collapsed, the value of their home deceased dramatically and so has their expectation of selling the house and moving to Florida and Arizona." The interest rates on savings and other FDIC-insured accounts now provides little or no interest income after adjusting for inflation.

[See 10 Ways the Recession Has Changed Retirement.]

Increasing reliance on Social Security. Social Security is the most common source of retirement income. Households with a member age 65 or older received an average of 65 percent of their retirement income from Social Security in 2008. But the recession may be causing many workers to sign up for Social Security benefits earlier than planned, which is resulting in them receiving smaller monthly checks. The proportion of adults who began drawing Social Security benefits at age 62 rose during the recession, from 30 percent in 2007 to 34 percent in 2010, according to a GAO analysis of Social Security Administration data. "More people claim at 62 than at any of the other ages," says Bovbjerg. "If you lose your job and you need money, you probably need to sign up at age 62. People who can't work longer are also going to claim benefits at 62." However, workers who began drawing benefits at age 62 during this period will permanently receive 25 percent less in monthly benefits than they would have if they waited until the full retirement age to sign up.

Twitter: @aiming2retire

Tags:
IRAs,
employment,
social security,
retirement,
unemployment

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

What about people on Social Security Disability?

I am on it now because of my Multiple Scerlosis.

Will what I'm receiving now drop dramtatically in retirement?

Ann Berg of CO 10:37AM November 09, 2011

If you were born in 1940, you're now 71, doing RMDs from your IRA. If you were born in 1961-2, you were one of the last two years of baby boomers, and you are 50 in 2012, and an "empty nester."

The former age group is annually making withdrawals from IRAs for spending money. More of them, every year. Millions more.

The latter age cohorts are probably plowing money in to retirement savings. They have to.

The vast baby boom mob of 80 million is now entirely age 50 to age 68. These folks are Savers now, not Spenders.

I suggest that the invention, and rapid acceptance, of the birth-control pill in 1959 ended the baby boom by 1962. There followed a 12- year decrease in number of babies being born. It's now 50+ years later, and the economic consequences of the 12-year decrease in births is contributing to the on-going, slow GDP. If the down-turn started in 2008, then we have 9 slow years to go, before the next up-turn caused by the next generation.

Andrew T Graybar, CFP, Tallahassee of FL 12:25PM November 04, 2011

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement

How to Live to 100

Why do some people live long, healthy, and happy lives, while others struggle with dementia, heart disease, and depression? Learn how to protect yourself from those outcomes based on the latest research on health, longevity, happiness, and finances in the U.S. News ebook.