• Comment (5)

How to Finance Life Until 100

These strategies will help you build a nest egg that will last the rest of your life

February 1, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Consider an annuity. Traditional pensions generally provide annuity payments that last the rest of your life. Those without a pension can create their own by turning over a portion of their savings to an insurance company in exchange for a promise of lifelong steady payments. "If you buy a solid annuity from an insurance company, it doesn't matter how long you live because you have transferred that risk to the insurance company," says Bodie. When deciding how much of your wealth to annuitize, consider the proportion of your annual expenses that are covered by other sources of income. "You want to make sure that between Social Security and any defined-benefit plan you have and any annuities you purchase that all your basic expenses are covered for the rest of your life," says Jack VanDerhei, research director at the Employee Benefit Research Institute.

Protect yourself from healthcare costs. Medicare will protect you from many, but not all of the healthcare expenses you will incur in retirement. Consider purchasing a supplemental policy to Medicare that fills in some of the gaps that Medicare doesn't cover. Middle-income retirees may also want to purchase long-term care insurance in case they require assisted living or nursing home care, which Medicare alone generally doesn't cover. "Assisted living can be horribly expensive," says Frank Armstrong, a certified financial planner and founder of Investor Solutions. "The very poor are going to be covered by Medicaid and the very rich can afford it, but the middle class needs to insure against long-term care costs."

[See One Move Could Boost Your Retirement Security.]

Draw down smart. Once you accumulate a large nest egg, you need a plan to spend it at a reasonable rate. Armstrong recommends spending 4 percent or less of your savings each year to help ensure that it will last the rest of your life. "If you can't make it with the amount of money that a 4 percent withdrawal rate provides, then maybe you ought not retire," he says. Remember that you will be required to take annual withdrawals from traditional retirement accounts after age 70½ and pay income tax on the amount withdrawn. "The million dollars you think you own in a 401(k) is actually only $750,000 after taxes," says Armstrong.

Twitter: @aiming2retire

Tags:
IRAs,
401(k),
social security,
senior citizens,
retirement,
personal finance,
IRA

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

maryland should give people 65 years or older a property tax break , and also on their income tax also times are very difficult to live when there is only one person receiving a pension and social security in that household, with food prices going up each and everyday gasoline going up in price also and taxes this is bad for retirees government should look into this and start helping these people instead of help other countries look after the elderly.

joe of MD 5:12PM June 23, 2012

retirement

Jackie of TX 2:37PM March 20, 2012

To me simply, retirement is something to work for...it is the benefit. I will not sell my life anymore. BS - work for your happiness --- yes comrad, you can, and to get yourself more happiness, why don't you work for me too?

Thanks.

Some things in this are simply perpetuating financial stupidity!

Take your benefit at age 66. Take your benefit at age 70. Whats the difference? Say 10K a year (fairly common to be in that range).

So one gives up receiving 40K for sure (because if they live to age 70, which the example makes absolute) they would have received that. (And say if they died at age 70, they & their estate never would have gotten that 40K).

Say one lives to age 85. Payments started at age 70. 15 years extra 10K payments equal an extra 150K in total, much of which is much later. Cost you 40 K, earlier. If you consider the time value of money and take the 40K in savings/investment, discounting the 150K for the decades to receive it, the difference, (while still probably better for the age 70 in absolute), is just not that great. And the downside loss, is absolute and severe. Possible an entire loss.

Jeffrey Heller of NJ 10:09PM March 19, 2012

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement

How to Live to 100

Why do some people live long, healthy, and happy lives, while others struggle with dementia, heart disease, and depression? Learn how to protect yourself from those outcomes based on the latest research on health, longevity, happiness, and finances in the U.S. News ebook.