• Comment (9)

4 Countries with Better 401(k) Plans than the United States

These foreign retirement accounts have lower fees and clearer disclosures than U.S. 401(k) plans

May 29, 2012 RSS Feed Print

United Kingdom. Beginning between 2012 and 2017, all employers will be required to automatically enroll eligible employees in a retirement account and provide a minimum contribution. Employers that do not offer a retirement account can automatically enroll their employees in a new national retirement account, the National Employment Savings Trust (NEST). Initially, a minimum of 2 percent of earnings must be contributed, with at least 1 percent coming from the employer. The contribution amount will increase to 8 percent by 2018, with the employer contributing a minimum of 3 percent, up to an annual contribution limit of £4,400. NEST will levy a 0.3 percent annual management charge and a 1.8 percent charge on contributions. "I have been very impressed with the mechanics that underlie how the NEST will operate. Should the scheme succeed, then I believe it will provide an excellent example of current best practice in the specification of private pensions," says Justin van de Ven, a senior research fellow at the National Institute of Economic and Social Research in London. "Should it fail, then I suspect that it will provide a case study of poor implementation."

In contrast to retirement accounts in these four countries, U.S. retirement accounts are entirely voluntary for both employers and workers. And the Labor Department's new fee-disclosure requirements will not actually show employees the effect of fees on their accounts over time in dollar amounts or the cumulative amount they have paid. "While Labor has made recent improvements to U.S. participants' fee disclosures, fee disclosure improvements made by some of the countries we reviewed may provide more transparent disclosures," the GAO report found. "U.S. participants typically do not receive the simple, useful, and more targeted information about their defined contribution retirement plans and investment options that is provided to participants in Chile, Sweden, and Australia, which could be why recent research shows that U.S. participants have misconceptions about the fees they pay."

Twitter: @aiming2retire

Tags:
IRAs,
401(k),
retirement,
money

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Were retiring ( my wife and I). Can we take our 401k's and assets and put it in a 401K in Sweden, for example. Or do we have to be a citizen.

Aime Casavant of ND 9:56PM June 15, 2012

There are MORE than these 4 countries with better retirement system. But what's the use of talking about them? Americans over 50 cannot relocate and start over in any of these countries (facing competition from younger local employees and, in many cases, language and cultural barriers.) We here should stop killing our Unions and instead of tightening everybody's belts finally go for the belts of the FATTEST 1%

jopa of CA 6:45PM June 13, 2012

What is Social Security in the USA if not an example of this type of plan with the exception of the colossal thievery of the funds by Congress?

retiree of FL 7:52AM June 12, 2012

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement

How to Live to 100

Why do some people live long, healthy, and happy lives, while others struggle with dementia, heart disease, and depression? Learn how to protect yourself from those outcomes based on the latest research on health, longevity, happiness, and finances in the U.S. News ebook.